1,093 research outputs found

    Permutations destroying arithmetic progressions in finite cyclic groups

    Full text link
    A permutation \pi of an abelian group G is said to destroy arithmetic progressions (APs) if, whenever (a,b,c) is a non-trivial 3-term AP in G, that is c-b=b-a and a,b,c are not all equal, then (\pi(a),\pi(b),\pi(c)) is not an AP. In a paper from 2004, the first author conjectured that such a permutation exists of Z/nZ, for all n except 2,3,5 and 7. Here we prove, as a special case of a more general result, that such a permutation exists for all n >= n_0, for some explcitly constructed number n_0 \approx 1.4 x 10^{14}. We also construct such a permutation of Z/pZ for all primes p > 3 such that p = 3 (mod 8).Comment: 11 pages, no figure

    Crucial and bicrucial permutations with respect to arithmetic monotone patterns

    Full text link
    A pattern Ο„\tau is a permutation, and an arithmetic occurrence of Ο„\tau in (another) permutation Ο€=Ο€1Ο€2...Ο€n\pi=\pi_1\pi_2...\pi_n is a subsequence Ο€i1Ο€i2...Ο€im\pi_{i_1}\pi_{i_2}...\pi_{i_m} of Ο€\pi that is order isomorphic to Ο„\tau where the numbers i1<i2<...<imi_1<i_2<...<i_m form an arithmetic progression. A permutation is (k,β„“)(k,\ell)-crucial if it avoids arithmetically the patterns 12...k12... k and β„“(β„“βˆ’1)...1\ell(\ell-1)... 1 but its extension to the right by any element does not avoid arithmetically these patterns. A (k,β„“)(k,\ell)-crucial permutation that cannot be extended to the left without creating an arithmetic occurrence of 12...k12... k or β„“(β„“βˆ’1)...1\ell(\ell-1)... 1 is called (k,β„“)(k,\ell)-bicrucial. In this paper we prove that arbitrary long (k,β„“)(k,\ell)-crucial and (k,β„“)(k,\ell)-bicrucial permutations exist for any k,β„“β‰₯3k,\ell\geq 3. Moreover, we show that the minimal length of a (k,β„“)(k,\ell)-crucial permutation is max⁑(k,β„“)(min⁑(k,β„“)βˆ’1)\max(k,\ell)(\min(k,\ell)-1), while the minimal length of a (k,β„“)(k,\ell)-bicrucial permutation is at most 2max⁑(k,β„“)(min⁑(k,β„“)βˆ’1)2\max(k,\ell)(\min(k,\ell)-1), again for k,β„“β‰₯3k,\ell\geq3

    Van der Waerden's Theorem and Avoidability in Words

    Full text link
    Pirillo and Varricchio, and independently, Halbeisen and Hungerbuhler considered the following problem, open since 1994: Does there exist an infinite word w over a finite subset of Z such that w contains no two consecutive blocks of the same length and sum? We consider some variations on this problem in the light of van der Waerden's theorem on arithmetic progressions.Comment: Co-author added; new result
    • …
    corecore