63,970 research outputs found
Synthetic Observational Health Data with GANs: from slow adoption to a boom in medical research and ultimately digital twins?
After being collected for patient care, Observational Health Data (OHD) can
further benefit patient well-being by sustaining the development of health
informatics and medical research. Vast potential is unexploited because of the
fiercely private nature of patient-related data and regulations to protect it.
Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) have recently emerged as a
groundbreaking way to learn generative models that produce realistic synthetic
data. They have revolutionized practices in multiple domains such as
self-driving cars, fraud detection, digital twin simulations in industrial
sectors, and medical imaging.
The digital twin concept could readily apply to modelling and quantifying
disease progression. In addition, GANs posses many capabilities relevant to
common problems in healthcare: lack of data, class imbalance, rare diseases,
and preserving privacy. Unlocking open access to privacy-preserving OHD could
be transformative for scientific research. In the midst of COVID-19, the
healthcare system is facing unprecedented challenges, many of which of are data
related for the reasons stated above.
Considering these facts, publications concerning GAN applied to OHD seemed to
be severely lacking. To uncover the reasons for this slow adoption, we broadly
reviewed the published literature on the subject. Our findings show that the
properties of OHD were initially challenging for the existing GAN algorithms
(unlike medical imaging, for which state-of-the-art model were directly
transferable) and the evaluation synthetic data lacked clear metrics.
We find more publications on the subject than expected, starting slowly in
2017, and since then at an increasing rate. The difficulties of OHD remain, and
we discuss issues relating to evaluation, consistency, benchmarking, data
modelling, and reproducibility.Comment: 31 pages (10 in previous version), not including references and
glossary, 51 in total. Inclusion of a large number of recent publications and
expansion of the discussion accordingl
Deep Learning versus Classical Regression for Brain Tumor Patient Survival Prediction
Deep learning for regression tasks on medical imaging data has shown
promising results. However, compared to other approaches, their power is
strongly linked to the dataset size. In this study, we evaluate
3D-convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and classical regression methods with
hand-crafted features for survival time regression of patients with high grade
brain tumors. The tested CNNs for regression showed promising but unstable
results. The best performing deep learning approach reached an accuracy of
51.5% on held-out samples of the training set. All tested deep learning
experiments were outperformed by a Support Vector Classifier (SVC) using 30
radiomic features. The investigated features included intensity, shape,
location and deep features. The submitted method to the BraTS 2018 survival
prediction challenge is an ensemble of SVCs, which reached a cross-validated
accuracy of 72.2% on the BraTS 2018 training set, 57.1% on the validation set,
and 42.9% on the testing set. The results suggest that more training data is
necessary for a stable performance of a CNN model for direct regression from
magnetic resonance images, and that non-imaging clinical patient information is
crucial along with imaging information.Comment: Contribution to The International Multimodal Brain Tumor Segmentation
(BraTS) Challenge 2018, survival prediction tas
- …