1,955 research outputs found
An Instantiation-Based Approach for Solving Quantified Linear Arithmetic
This paper presents a framework to derive instantiation-based decision
procedures for satisfiability of quantified formulas in first-order theories,
including its correctness, implementation, and evaluation. Using this framework
we derive decision procedures for linear real arithmetic (LRA) and linear
integer arithmetic (LIA) formulas with one quantifier alternation. Our
procedure can be integrated into the solving architecture used by typical SMT
solvers. Experimental results on standardized benchmarks from model checking,
static analysis, and synthesis show that our implementation of the procedure in
the SMT solver CVC4 outperforms existing tools for quantified linear
arithmetic
On Deciding Local Theory Extensions via E-matching
Satisfiability Modulo Theories (SMT) solvers incorporate decision procedures
for theories of data types that commonly occur in software. This makes them
important tools for automating verification problems. A limitation frequently
encountered is that verification problems are often not fully expressible in
the theories supported natively by the solvers. Many solvers allow the
specification of application-specific theories as quantified axioms, but their
handling is incomplete outside of narrow special cases.
In this work, we show how SMT solvers can be used to obtain complete decision
procedures for local theory extensions, an important class of theories that are
decidable using finite instantiation of axioms. We present an algorithm that
uses E-matching to generate instances incrementally during the search,
significantly reducing the number of generated instances compared to eager
instantiation strategies. We have used two SMT solvers to implement this
algorithm and conducted an extensive experimental evaluation on benchmarks
derived from verification conditions for heap-manipulating programs. We believe
that our results are of interest to both the users of SMT solvers as well as
their developers
On Counterexample Guided Quantifier Instantiation for Synthesis in CVC4
We introduce the first program synthesis engine implemented inside an SMT
solver. We present an approach that extracts solution functions from
unsatisfiability proofs of the negated form of synthesis conjectures. We also
discuss novel counterexample-guided techniques for quantifier instantiation
that we use to make finding such proofs practically feasible. A particularly
important class of specifications are single-invocation properties, for which
we present a dedicated algorithm. To support syntax restrictions on generated
solutions, our approach can transform a solution found without restrictions
into the desired syntactic form. As an alternative, we show how to use
evaluation function axioms to embed syntactic restrictions into constraints
over algebraic datatypes, and then use an algebraic datatype decision procedure
to drive synthesis. Our experimental evaluation on syntax-guided synthesis
benchmarks shows that our implementation in the CVC4 SMT solver is competitive
with state-of-the-art tools for synthesis
Ranking Templates for Linear Loops
We present a new method for the constraint-based synthesis of termination
arguments for linear loop programs based on linear ranking templates. Linear
ranking templates are parametrized, well-founded relations such that an
assignment to the parameters gives rise to a ranking function. This approach
generalizes existing methods and enables us to use templates for many different
ranking functions with affine-linear components. We discuss templates for
multiphase, piecewise, and lexicographic ranking functions. Because these
ranking templates require both strict and non-strict inequalities, we use
Motzkin's Transposition Theorem instead of Farkas Lemma to transform the
generated -constraint into an -constraint.Comment: TACAS 201
Invariant Synthesis for Incomplete Verification Engines
We propose a framework for synthesizing inductive invariants for incomplete
verification engines, which soundly reduce logical problems in undecidable
theories to decidable theories. Our framework is based on the counter-example
guided inductive synthesis principle (CEGIS) and allows verification engines to
communicate non-provability information to guide invariant synthesis. We show
precisely how the verification engine can compute such non-provability
information and how to build effective learning algorithms when invariants are
expressed as Boolean combinations of a fixed set of predicates. Moreover, we
evaluate our framework in two verification settings, one in which verification
engines need to handle quantified formulas and one in which verification
engines have to reason about heap properties expressed in an expressive but
undecidable separation logic. Our experiments show that our invariant synthesis
framework based on non-provability information can both effectively synthesize
inductive invariants and adequately strengthen contracts across a large suite
of programs
- …