6 research outputs found

    An Information-Theoretic View for Deep Learning

    Full text link
    Deep learning has transformed computer vision, natural language processing, and speech recognition\cite{badrinarayanan2017segnet, dong2016image, ren2017faster, ji20133d}. However, two critical questions remain obscure: (1) why do deep neural networks generalize better than shallow networks; and (2) does it always hold that a deeper network leads to better performance? Specifically, letting LL be the number of convolutional and pooling layers in a deep neural network, and nn be the size of the training sample, we derive an upper bound on the expected generalization error for this network, i.e., \begin{eqnarray*} \mathbb{E}[R(W)-R_S(W)] \leq \exp{\left(-\frac{L}{2}\log{\frac{1}{\eta}}\right)}\sqrt{\frac{2\sigma^2}{n}I(S,W) } \end{eqnarray*} where σ>0\sigma >0 is a constant depending on the loss function, 0<η<10<\eta<1 is a constant depending on the information loss for each convolutional or pooling layer, and I(S,W)I(S, W) is the mutual information between the training sample SS and the output hypothesis WW. This upper bound shows that as the number of convolutional and pooling layers LL increases in the network, the expected generalization error will decrease exponentially to zero. Layers with strict information loss, such as the convolutional layers, reduce the generalization error for the whole network; this answers the first question. However, algorithms with zero expected generalization error does not imply a small test error or E[R(W)]\mathbb{E}[R(W)]. This is because E[RS(W)]\mathbb{E}[R_S(W)] is large when the information for fitting the data is lost as the number of layers increases. This suggests that the claim `the deeper the better' is conditioned on a small training error or E[RS(W)]\mathbb{E}[R_S(W)]. Finally, we show that deep learning satisfies a weak notion of stability and the sample complexity of deep neural networks will decrease as LL increases.Comment: Add details in the proof of Theorem

    Theoretical Analysis of Adversarial Learning: A Minimax Approach

    Full text link
    Here we propose a general theoretical method for analyzing the risk bound in the presence of adversaries. Specifically, we try to fit the adversarial learning problem into the minimax framework. We first show that the original adversarial learning problem can be reduced to a minimax statistical learning problem by introducing a transport map between distributions. Then, we prove a new risk bound for this minimax problem in terms of covering numbers under a weak version of Lipschitz condition. Our method can be applied to multi-class classification problems and commonly used loss functions such as the hinge and ramp losses. As some illustrative examples, we derive the adversarial risk bounds for SVMs, deep neural networks, and PCA, and our bounds have two data-dependent terms, which can be optimized for achieving adversarial robustness.Comment: 27 pages, add some reference

    Autonomous Deep Quality Monitoring in Streaming Environments

    Full text link
    The common practice of quality monitoring in industry relies on manual inspection well-known to be slow, error-prone and operator-dependent. This issue raises strong demand for automated real-time quality monitoring developed from data-driven approaches thus alleviating from operator dependence and adapting to various process uncertainties. Nonetheless, current approaches do not take into account the streaming nature of sensory information while relying heavily on hand-crafted features making them application-specific. This paper proposes the online quality monitoring methodology developed from recently developed deep learning algorithms for data streams, Neural Networks with Dynamically Evolved Capacity (NADINE), namely NADINE++. It features the integration of 1-D and 2-D convolutional layers to extract natural features of time-series and visual data streams captured from sensors and cameras of the injection molding machines from our own project. Real-time experiments have been conducted where the online quality monitoring task is simulated on the fly under the prequential test-then-train fashion - the prominent data stream evaluation protocol. Comparison with the state-of-the-art techniques clearly exhibits the advantage of NADINE++ with 4.68\% improvement on average for the quality monitoring task in streaming environments. To support the reproducible research initiative, codes, results of NADINE++ along with supplementary materials and injection molding dataset are made available in \url{https://github.com/ContinualAL/NADINE-IJCNN2021}.Comment: This paper has been accepted for publication in IJCNN, 202

    A Probabilistic Representation of DNNs: Bridging Mutual Information and Generalization

    Full text link
    Recently, Mutual Information (MI) has attracted attention in bounding the generalization error of Deep Neural Networks (DNNs). However, it is intractable to accurately estimate the MI in DNNs, thus most previous works have to relax the MI bound, which in turn weakens the information theoretic explanation for generalization. To address the limitation, this paper introduces a probabilistic representation of DNNs for accurately estimating the MI. Leveraging the proposed MI estimator, we validate the information theoretic explanation for generalization, and derive a tighter generalization bound than the state-of-the-art relaxations.Comment: To appear in the ICML 2021 Workshop on Theoretic Foundation, Criticism, and Application Trend of Explainable A

    Think Global, Act Local: Relating DNN generalisation and node-level SNR

    Full text link
    The reasons behind good DNN generalisation remain an open question. In this paper we explore the problem by looking at the Signal-to-Noise Ratio of nodes in the network. Starting from information theory principles, it is possible to derive an expression for the SNR of a DNN node output. Using this expression we construct figures-of-merit that quantify how well the weights of a node optimise SNR (or, equivalently, information rate). Applying these figures-of-merit, we give examples indicating that weight sets that promote good SNR performance also exhibit good generalisation. In addition, we are able to identify the qualities of weight sets that exhibit good SNR behaviour and hence promote good generalisation. This leads to a discussion of how these results relate to network training and regularisation. Finally, we identify some ways that these observations can be used in training design.Comment: 15 pages, 5 figures; for associated colab files see http://github.com/pnorridge/think-global-act-local/setting

    Generalization Bounds for Convolutional Neural Networks

    Full text link
    Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have achieved breakthrough performances in a wide range of applications including image classification, semantic segmentation, and object detection. Previous research on characterizing the generalization ability of neural networks mostly focuses on fully connected neural networks (FNNs), regarding CNNs as a special case of FNNs without taking into account the special structure of convolutional layers. In this work, we propose a tighter generalization bound for CNNs by exploiting the sparse and permutation structure of its weight matrices. As the generalization bound relies on the spectral norm of weight matrices, we further study spectral norms of three commonly used convolution operations including standard convolution, depthwise convolution, and pointwise convolution. Theoretical and experimental results both demonstrate that our bounds for CNNs are tighter than existing bounds
    corecore