278 research outputs found

    ํ•œ๊ตญ์ธ ๊ณ ๋“ฑํ•™์ƒ์˜ ์˜์–ด ํ˜•์šฉ์‚ฌ ํƒ€๋™๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๊ตฌ๋ฌธ ํ•™์Šต์—์„œ์˜ ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ์ฑ—๋ด‡ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ต์ˆ˜์˜ ํšจ๊ณผ

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(๋ฐ•์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ์‚ฌ๋ฒ”๋Œ€ํ•™ ์™ธ๊ตญ์–ด๊ต์œก๊ณผ(์˜์–ด์ „๊ณต), 2022.2. ๊น€๊ธฐํƒ.English adjectival transitive resultative constructions (VtR) are notoriously challenging for Korean L2 English learners due to their syntactic and semantic differences from their L1 counterparts. To deal with such a complex structure, like English adjectival VtR, Korean L2 English learners need instructional interventions, including explicit instructions and corrective feedback on the target structure. Human instructors are virtually incapable of offering adequate corrective feedback, as providing corrective feedback from a human teacher to hundreds of students requires excessive time and effort. To deal with the practicality problems faced by human instructors in providing corrective feedback, numerous artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots have been developed to provide foreign language learners with corrective feedback on par with human teachers. Regrettably, many currently available AI chatbots remain underdeveloped. In addition, no prior research has been conducted to assess the effectiveness of corrective feedback offered by an AI chatbot, a human instructor, or additional explicit instruction via video material. The current study examined the instructional effects of corrective feedback from an AI chatbot on Korean high school studentsโ€™ comprehension and production of adjectival VtR. Also, the current study investigated whether the corrective feedback generated by the AI chatbot enables Korean L2 English learners to expand their constructional repertoire beyond instructed adjectival VtR to uninstructed prepositional VtR. To investigate these issues, text-based Facebook Messenger AI chatbots were developed by the researcher. The effectiveness of the AI chatbotsโ€™ corrective feedback was compared with that of a human instructor and with additional video material. Students were divided into four groups: three instructional groups and one control group. The instructional groups included a chatbot group, a human group, and a video group. All learners in the three instructional groups watched a 5-minute explicit instruction video on the form and meaning pairings of the adjectival VtR in English. After that, learners were divided into three groups based on their preferences for instructional types. The learners volunteered to participate in the instructional procedures with corrective feedback from a text-based AI chatbot, a human instructor, or additional explicit instruction using a 15-minute video. Moreover, they took part in three testing sessions, which included a pretest, an immediate posttest, and a delayed posttest. The control group students were not instructed, and only participated in the three testing sessions. Two tasks were used for each test session: an acceptability judgment task (AJT) and an elicited writing task (EWT). The AJT tested participantsโ€™ comprehension of instructed adjectival VtR and uninstructed prepositional VtR. The EWT examined the correct production of instructed adjectival VtR and uninstructed prepositional VtR. The results of the AJT revealed that the instructional treatment (e.g., corrective feedback from the AI chatbot or a human instructor, or additional explicit instruction from the video material) was marginally more effective at improving the comprehension of adjectival VtR than was the case with the control group. On the other hand, the instructional treatment on the adjectival VtR failed in the generalization to prepositional VtR which was not overtly instructed. In the EWT, the participants in the corrective feedback groups (e.g., the chatbot and human groups) showed a more significant increase in the correct production of the instructed adjectival VtR more so than those in the video and control groups. Furthermore, the chatbot group learners showed significantly higher production of uninstructed prepositional VtR compared to any other group participants. These findings suggest that chatbot-based instruction can help Korean high school L2 English learners comprehend and produce complex linguistic structuresโ€”namely, adjectival and prepositional VtR. Moreover, the current study has major pedagogical implications for principled frameworks for implementing AI chatbot-based instruction in the context of foreign language learning.์˜์–ด ํ˜•์šฉ์‚ฌ ํƒ€๋™๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๊ตฌ๋ฌธ(English Adjectival Transitive Resultative Construction)์€ ํ•œ๊ตญ์ธ ์˜์–ด ํ•™์Šต์ž๋“ค์—๊ฒŒ ๋ชจ๊ตญ์–ด์˜ ๋Œ€์‘ ๊ตฌ๋ฌธ์ด ๊ฐ–๋Š” ์˜๋ฏธ ํ†ต์‚ฌ๋ก ์  ์ฐจ์ด๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ํ•™์Šตํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋งค์šฐ ์–ด๋ ค์šด ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ์•Œ๋ ค์ ธ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ์˜์–ด ํ˜•์šฉ์‚ฌ ํƒ€๋™๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๊ตฌ๋ฌธ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ๊ตฌ๋ฌธ์„ ํ•™์Šตํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ, ํ•œ๊ตญ์ธ ์˜์–ด ํ•™์Šต์ž๋“ค์—๊ฒŒ๋Š” ๋ชฉํ‘œ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ช…์‹œ์  ๊ต์ˆ˜์™€ ๊ต์ •์  ํ”ผ๋“œ๋ฐฑ์„ ํฌํ•จํ•œ ๊ต์ˆ˜ ์ฒ˜์น˜๊ฐ€ ์š”๊ตฌ๋œ๋‹ค. ์ˆ˜๋ฐฑ ๋ช…์˜ ํ•™์Šต์ž๋“ค์—๊ฒŒ ๊ต์ •์  ํ”ผ๋“œ๋ฐฑ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ๊ณผ๋„ํ•œ ์‹œ๊ฐ„๊ณผ ๋…ธ๋ ฅ์ด ์š”๊ตฌ๋˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์—, ์ธ๊ฐ„ ๊ต์‚ฌ๊ฐ€ ์ ์ ˆํ•œ ์–‘์˜ ๊ต์ •์  ํ”ผ๋“œ๋ฐฑ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•œ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ์‚ฌ์‹ค์ƒ ๋ถˆ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๋‹ค. ๊ต์ •์  ํ”ผ๋“œ๋ฐฑ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•  ๋•Œ ์ง๋ฉดํ•˜๋Š” ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์‹ค์šฉ์„ฑ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ, ์™ธ๊ตญ์–ด ํ•™์Šต์ž๋“ค์—๊ฒŒ ์ธ๊ฐ„ ๊ต์‚ฌ์™€ ์œ ์‚ฌํ•œ ๊ต์ • ํ”ผ๋“œ๋ฐฑ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์ˆ˜๋งŽ์€ ์ธ๊ณต ์ง€๋Šฅ(AI) ์ฑ—๋ด‡์ด ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์œ ๊ฐ์Šค๋Ÿฝ๊ฒŒ๋„, ํ˜„์žฌ ์‚ฌ์šฉ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ๋งŽ์€ ์™ธ๊ตญ์–ด ํ•™์Šต์šฉ ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ์ฑ—๋ด‡์€ ์•„์ง ์ถฉ๋ถ„ํžˆ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๋˜์ง€ ์•Š์€ ์ƒํƒœ์— ๋‚จ์•„์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ์ฑ—๋ด‡์˜ ๊ต์ •์  ํ”ผ๋“œ๋ฐฑ์ด ๊ฐ–๋Š” ๊ต์ˆ˜ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋น„๊ต ๋ถ„์„ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ํ˜„์žฌ ์ด๋ฃจ์–ด์ง€์ง€ ์•Š์€ ์ƒํƒœ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์„ ํ–‰์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ํ•œ๊ณ„์— ์ดˆ์ ์„ ๋‘์–ด, ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ์ฑ—๋ด‡์˜ ๊ต์ •์  ํ”ผ๋“œ๋ฐฑ์ด ํ•œ๊ตญ ๊ณ ๋“ฑํ•™์ƒ์˜ ์˜์–ด ํ˜•์šฉ์‚ฌ ํƒ€๋™๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๊ตฌ๋ฌธ์˜ ์ดํ•ด์™€ ์ƒ์„ฑ์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ๊ต์ˆ˜ ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์‚ดํŽด๋ณด์•˜๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ต์ˆ˜ ํšจ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ์–ธ์–ด์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์˜์–ด ๊ตฌ๋ฌธ์˜ ํ•™์Šต์—๋„ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ผ์น˜๋Š”์ง€๋ฅผ ์•Œ์•„๋ณด๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๊ต์‹ค์—์„œ ์ง์ ‘ ๊ฐ€๋ฅด์น˜์ง€ ์•Š์•˜๋˜ ๊ตฌ๋ฌธ์ธ ์˜์–ด ์ „์น˜์‚ฌ ํƒ€๋™๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๊ตฌ๋ฌธ(English Prepositional Transitive Resultative Construction)์˜ ํ•™์Šต ์–‘์ƒ์„ ์•Œ์•„๋ณด์•˜๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด, ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ํ…์ŠคํŠธ ๋ฉ”์‹œ์ง€ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์˜ ํŽ˜์ด์Šค๋ถ ๋ฉ”์‹ ์ €์—์„œ ๊ตฌ๋™๋˜๋Š” ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ์ฑ—๋ด‡์„ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ์ฑ—๋ด‡์˜ ๊ต์ˆ˜ํšจ๊ณผ ๊ฒ€์ฆ์„ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์— ์ฐธ์—ฌํ•œ ํ•™์ƒ๋“ค์€ ๋„ค ๊ฐœ์˜ ์ง‘๋‹จ์œผ๋กœ ๊ตฌ๋ถ„๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค: ์„ธ ๊ฐœ์˜ ๊ต์ˆ˜ ์ง‘๋‹จ์—๋Š” ๊ต์ˆ˜์ฒ˜์น˜๊ฐ€ ์ ์šฉ๋˜์—ˆ๊ณ , ํ•œ ๊ฐœ์˜ ํ†ต์ œ ์ง‘๋‹จ์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ต์ˆ˜์ฒ˜์น˜๊ฐ€ ์ ์šฉ๋˜์ง€ ์•Š์•˜๋‹ค. ๊ต์ˆ˜์ฒ˜์น˜๊ฐ€ ์ ์šฉ๋œ ์„ธ ๊ฐœ์˜ ์ง‘๋‹จ์€ ์ฑ—๋ด‡๊ทธ๋ฃน, ์ธ๊ฐ„๊ทธ๋ฃน, ์˜์ƒ๊ทธ๋ฃน์œผ๋กœ ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋“ค์€ ๋ชจ๋‘ ์˜์–ด๋กœ ๋œ ํ˜•์šฉ์‚ฌ ํƒ€๋™๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๊ตฌ๋ฌธ์˜ ํ˜•ํƒœ์™€ ์˜๋ฏธ ์Œ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ 5๋ถ„ ๊ธธ์ด์˜ ํ•™์Šต ๋น„๋””์˜ค๋ฅผ ์‹œ์ฒญํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ๋ช…์‹œ์  ๊ต์ˆ˜ ์ฒ˜์น˜๋ฅผ ๋ฐ›์•˜๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ๋น„๋””์˜ค๋ฅผ ์‹œ์ฒญํ•œ ํ›„ ์„ธ ๊ทธ๋ฃน์˜ ํ•™์Šต์ž๋“ค์€ ๊ต์žฌ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ œ๊ณต๋˜๋Š” ์–ธ์–ด์—ฐ์Šต์ž๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•˜๋Š” ๊ณผ์—…์— ์ฐธ์—ฌํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋‹ค์Œ์œผ๋กœ ์„ธ ์ง‘๋‹จ(์ฑ—๋ด‡๊ทธ๋ฃน, ์ธ๊ฐ„๊ทธ๋ฃน, ์˜์ƒ๊ทธ๋ฃน)์€ ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ์ถ”๊ฐ€์  ๊ต์ˆ˜์ฒ˜์น˜๋ฅผ ๋ฐ›์•˜๋‹ค: ์ฑ—๋ด‡๊ทธ๋ฃน ํ•™์Šต์ž๋“ค์€ ๊ต์žฌ ํ™œ๋™๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ํ…์ŠคํŠธ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ์ฑ—๋ด‡๊ณผ์˜ ๋Œ€ํ™”์— ์ฐธ์—ฌํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ์˜ค๋ฅ˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ต์ •์  ํ”ผ๋“œ๋ฐฑ์„ ๋ฐ›์•˜๋‹ค. ์ธ๊ฐ„๊ทธ๋ฃน ํ•™์Šต์ž๋“ค์€ ๊ต์žฌํ™œ๋™์„ ์™„์ˆ˜ํ•œ ๋‚ด์šฉ์„ ์ธ๊ฐ„ ๊ต์‚ฌ์—๊ฒŒ ์ „์†กํ•˜๊ณ , ์ด์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ต์ •์  ํ”ผ๋“œ๋ฐฑ์„ ๋ฐ›์•˜๋‹ค. ์˜์ƒ๊ทธ๋ฃน ํ•™์Šต์ž๋“ค์€ ๊ต์žฌํ™œ๋™์„ ์™„์ˆ˜ํ•œ ํ›„ ์ด์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ 15๋ถ„์˜ ์ถ”๊ฐ€์ ์ธ ๋ช…์‹œ์  ๊ต์ˆ˜์ž๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ์˜์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ์‹œ์ฒญํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ํ•™์Šต์ž์˜ ๊ต์ˆ˜ํšจ๊ณผ๋Š” ์‚ฌ์ „์‹œํ—˜, ์‚ฌํ›„์‹œํ—˜ ๋ฐ ์ง€์—ฐ ์‚ฌํ›„์‹œํ—˜์œผ๋กœ ๊ฒ€์ฆ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ํ•œํŽธ ํ†ต์ œ ์ง‘๋‹จ ํ•™์ƒ๋“ค์€ ๊ต์ˆ˜์ฒ˜์น˜ ์—†์ด ์„ธ ๋ฒˆ์˜ ์‹œํ—˜์—๋งŒ ์ฐธ์—ฌํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์„ธ ์ฐจ๋ก€์˜ ์‹œํ—˜์—์„œ๋Š” ์ˆ˜์šฉ์„ฑํŒ๋‹จ๊ณผ์ œ(AJT)์™€ ์œ ๋„์ž‘๋ฌธ๊ณผ์ œ(EWT)์˜ ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๊ณผ์ œ๊ฐ€ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ˆ˜์šฉ์„ฑํŒ๋‹จ๊ณผ์ œ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ, ๊ต์ˆ˜๋œ ์˜์–ด ํ˜•์šฉ์‚ฌ ํƒ€๋™๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๊ตฌ๋ฌธ๊ณผ ์ง€์‹œ๋˜์ง€ ์•Š์€ ์˜์–ด ์ „์น˜์‚ฌ ํƒ€๋™๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๊ตฌ๋ฌธ ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ฐธ๊ฐ€์ž์˜ ์ดํ•ด๋„๋ฅผ ์ธก์ •ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์œ ๋„์ž‘๋ฌธ๊ณผ์ œ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ต์ˆ˜๋œ ์˜์–ด ํ˜•์šฉ์‚ฌ ํƒ€๋™๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๊ตฌ๋ฌธ๊ณผ ์ง€์‹œ๋˜์ง€ ์•Š์€ ์˜์–ด ์ „์น˜์‚ฌ ํƒ€๋™๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๊ตฌ๋ฌธ์„ ์ฐธ์—ฌ์ž๊ฐ€ ์ •ํ™•ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์‚ฐ์ถœํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š”์ง€๋ฅผ ์ธก์ •ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์‹œํ—˜์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์•˜๋‹ค. ์ˆ˜์šฉ์„ฑํŒ๋‹จ๊ณผ์ œ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ๊ต์ˆ˜์ฒ˜์น˜๊ฐ€ ์ ์šฉ๋œ ์„ธ ์ง‘๋‹จ์ด ํ†ต์ œ ์ง‘๋‹จ๋ณด๋‹ค ํ˜•์šฉ์‚ฌ ํƒ€๋™๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๊ตฌ๋ฌธ์˜ ์ดํ•ด๋„ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์— ์•ฝ๊ฐ„ ๋” ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์ธ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ํ˜•์šฉ์‚ฌ ํƒ€๋™๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๊ตฌ๋ฌธ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ต์ˆ˜์ ์ฒ˜์น˜๋Š” ๊ต์ˆ˜๋˜์ง€ ์•Š์€ ์ „์น˜์‚ฌ ํƒ€๋™๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๊ตฌ๋ฌธ์œผ๋กœ์˜ ํ•™์Šต์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์ฃผ์ง€ ๋ชปํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์œ ๋„์ž‘๋ฌธ๊ณผ์ œ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ์ฑ—๋ด‡์ด๋‚˜ ์ธ๊ฐ„ ๊ต์‚ฌ์— ์˜ํ•ด ์ œ๊ณต๋˜๋Š” ๊ต์ • ํ”ผ๋“œ๋ฐฑ ๊ทธ๋ฃน์˜ ์ฐธ๊ฐ€์ž๊ฐ€ ์˜์ƒ๊ทธ๋ฃน ๋ฐ ํ†ต์ œ์ง‘๋‹จ์˜ ์ฐธ๊ฐ€์ž๋ณด๋‹ค ํ˜•์šฉ์‚ฌ ํƒ€๋™๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๊ตฌ๋ฌธ์˜ ์˜ฌ๋ฐ”๋ฅธ ์ƒ์„ฑ์— ๋” ์œ ์˜๋ฏธํ•œ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋“œ๋Ÿฌ๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. ๋™์ผํ•œ ๊ต์ˆ˜ ํšจ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ์ „์น˜์‚ฌ ํƒ€๋™๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๊ตฌ๋ฌธ์˜ ํ•™์Šต์—์„œ๋„ ๊ด€์ธก๋˜์–ด, ํ˜•์šฉ์‚ฌ ํƒ€๋™๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๊ตฌ๋ฌธ์˜ ํ•™์Šต์ด ์ „์น˜์‚ฌ ํƒ€๋™๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๊ตฌ๋ฌธ์˜ ํ•™์Šต์— ์ผ๋ฐ˜ํ™”๊ฐ€ ์ผ์–ด๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์ธ๊ฐ„ ๊ต์‚ฌ๊ฐ€ ์ง๋ฉดํ•ด์•ผ ํ•˜๋Š” ์‹ค์šฉ์„ฑ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ๊ทน๋ณตํ•˜๊ณ , ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ์ฑ—๋ด‡์ด ํ•œ๊ตญ์ธ ๊ณ ๋“ฑํ•™๊ต L2 ์˜์–ด ํ•™์Šต์ž๊ฐ€ ํ˜•์šฉ์‚ฌ ๋ฐ ์ „์น˜์‚ฌ ํƒ€๋™๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๊ตฌ๋ฌธ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ์–ธ์–ด ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๊ณ  ์ƒ์„ฑํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ์— ์ธ๊ฐ„ ๊ต์‚ฌ์™€ ๋น„๊ฒฌ๋  ์ •๋„๋กœ ๊ต์ •์  ํ”ผ๋“œ๋ฐฑ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์„ ๊ฒƒ์ž„์„ ์‹œ์‚ฌํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์ธ๊ณต์ง€๋Šฅ ์ฑ—๋ด‡ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์™ธ๊ตญ์–ด ๊ต์œก์˜ ์‹ค์ œ์  ์‚ฌ๋ก€ ๋ฐ ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์„ ๋„์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ฃผ์—ˆ๋‹ค๋Š” ์ ์—์„œ ์˜๋ฏธ๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋‹ค.ABSTRACT i TABLE OF CONTENTS iii LIST OF TABLES v LIST OF FIGURES vii CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1. Statement of Problems and Objectives 1 1.2. Scope of the Research 6 1.3. Research Questions 9 1.4. Organization of the Dissertation 10 CHAPTER 2. LITERATURE REVIEW 12 2.1. Syntactic and Semantic Analysis of Korean and English Transitive Resultative Constructions 13 2.1.1. Syntactic Analysis of English Transitive Resultative Construction 13 2.1.2. Syntactic Analysis of Korean Transitive Resultative Constructions 25 2.1.3. Semantic Differences in VtR between Korean and English 46 2.1.4. Previous acquisition study on English adjectival and prepositional VtR 54 2.2. Corrective Feedback 59 2.2.1. Definition of Corrective Feedback 59 2.2.2. Types of Corrective Feedback 61 2.2.3. Noticeability in Corrective Feedback 67 2.2.4. Corrective Recast as a Stepwise Corrective Feedback 69 2.3. The AI Chatbot in Foreign Language Learning 72 2.3.1. Non-communicative Intelligent Computer Assisted Language Learning (ICALL) 73 2.3.2. AI Chatbot without Corrective Feedback 79 2.3.3. AI Chatbot with Corrective Feedback 86 2.4. Summary of the Literature Review 92 CHAPTER 3. METHODOLOGY 98 3.1. Participants 98 3.2. Target Structure 102 3.3. Procedure of the Study 106 3.4. Instructional Material Shared by the Experimental Group 107 3.4.1. General Framework of the Instructional Session 108 3.4.2. Instructional Material Shared by Experimental Groups 111 3.5. Group-specific Instructional Treatments: Post-Written Instructional Material Activities on Corrective Feedback from Chatbot, Human, and Additional Explicit Instruction via Video 121 3.5.1. Corrective Feedback from the AI Chatbot 122 3.5.2. Corrective Feedback from a Human Instructor 136 3.5.3. Additional Instruction via Video Material 139 3.6. Test 142 3.6.1. Acceptability Judgment Task (AJT) 144 3.6.2. Elicited Writing Task (EWT) 150 3.7. Statistical Analysis 152 CHAPTER 4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS 154 4.1. Results of Acceptability Judgment Task (AJT) 154 4.1.1. AJT Results of Instructed Adjectival VtR 155 4.1.2. AJT Results of Uninstructed Prepositional VtR 160 4.1.3. Discussion 164 4.2. Results of Elicited Writing Task (EWT) 175 4.2.1. EWT Results for Instructed Adjectival VtR 176 4.2.2. EWT Results of Uninstructed Prepositional VtR 181 4.2.3. Further Analysis 187 4.2.4. Discussion 199 CHAPTER 5. CONCLUSION 205 5.1. Summary of the Findings and Implications 205 5.2. Limitations and Suggestions for Future Research 213 REFERENCES 217 APPENDICES 246 ABSTRACT IN KOREAN 297๋ฐ•

    Deriving Design Knowledge for eLearning Companions to Support International Students

    Get PDF
    International students often have difficulties in getting connected with other students (from their host country), or in fully understanding the lectures due to barriers such as interacting in a foreign language or adjusting to a new campus. eLearning Companions (eLCs) act as virtual friends, accompany students with dialog-based support for learning and provide individual guidance. We contribute to the lack of prescriptive design knowledge for that specific use case by deriving 16 design principles for eLCs and transferring them into an expository instantiation along the Design Science Research paradigm. We build upon 14 identified literature requirements and 15 condensed user requirements resulting from an empirical study with 76 Chinese-speaking exchange students at a German university. Our objective is to extend the knowledge base and support scientists and practitioners in eLC design for non-native students to initiate further research and discussion

    Value Co-Creation in Smart Services: A Functional Affordances Perspective on Smart Personal Assistants

    Get PDF
    In the realm of smart services, smart personal assistants (SPAs) have become a popular medium for value co-creation between service providers and users. The market success of SPAs is largely based on their innovative material properties, such as natural language user interfaces, machine learning-powered request handling and service provision, and anthropomorphism. In different combinations, these properties offer users entirely new ways to intuitively and interactively achieve their goals and thus co-create value with service providers. But how does the nature of the SPA shape value co-creation processes? In this paper, we look through a functional affordances lens to theorize about the effects of different types of SPAs (i.e., with different combinations of material properties) on usersโ€™ value co-creation processes. Specifically, we collected SPAs from research and practice by reviewing scientific literature and web resources, developed a taxonomy of SPAsโ€™ material properties, and performed a cluster analysis to group SPAs of a similar nature. We then derived 2 general and 11 cluster-specific propositions on how different material properties of SPAs can yield different affordances for value co-creation. With our work, we point out that smart services require researchers and practitioners to fundamentally rethink value co-creation as well as revise affordances theory to address the dynamic nature of smart technology as a service counterpart

    A social robot connected with chatGPT to improve cognitive functioning in ASD subjects

    Get PDF
    Neurodevelopmental Disorders (NDDs) represent a significant healthcare and economic burden for families and society. Technology, including AI and digital technologies, offers potential solutions for the assessment, monitoring, and treatment of NDDs. However, further research is needed to determine the effectiveness, feasibility, and acceptability of these technologies in NDDs, and to address the challenges associated with their implementation. In this work, we present the application of social robotics using a Pepper robot connected to the OpenAI system (Chat-GPT) for real-time dialogue initiation with the robot. After describing the general architecture of the system, we present two possible simulated interaction scenarios of a subject with Autism Spectrum Disorder in two different situations. Limitations and future implementations are also provided to provide an overview of the potential developments of interconnected systems that could greatly contribute to technological advancements for Neurodevelopmental Disorders (NDD)

    RoboREIT: an Interactive Robotic Tutor with Instructive Feedback Component for Requirements Elicitation Interview Training

    Full text link
    [Context] Interviewing stakeholders is the most popular requirements elicitation technique among multiple methods. The success of an interview depends on the collaboration of the interviewee which can be fostered through the interviewer's preparedness and communication skills. Mastering these skills requires experience and practicing interviews. [Problem] Practical training is resource-heavy as it calls for the time and effort of a stakeholder for each student which may not be feasible for a large number of students. [Method] To address this scalability problem, this paper proposes RoboREIT, an interactive Robotic tutor for Requirements Elicitation Interview Training. The humanoid robotic component of RoboREIT responds to the questions of the interviewer, which the interviewer chooses from a set of predefined alternatives for a particular scenario. After the interview session, RoboREIT provides contextual feedback to the interviewer on their performance and allows the student to inspect their mistakes. RoboREIT is extensible with various scenarios. [Results] We performed an exploratory user study to evaluate RoboREIT and demonstrate its applicability in requirements elicitation interview training. The quantitative and qualitative analyses of the users' responses reveal the appreciation of RoboREIT and provide further suggestions about how to improve it. [Contribution] Our study is the first in the literature that utilizes a social robot in requirements elicitation interview education. RoboREIT's innovative design incorporates replaying faulty interview stages and allows the student to learn from mistakes by a second time practicing. All participants praised the feedback component, which is not present in the state-of-the-art, for being helpful in identifying the mistakes. A favorable response rate of 81% for the system's usefulness indicates the positive perception of the participants.Comment: Author submitted manuscrip

    Data Science and Knowledge Discovery

    Get PDF
    Data Science (DS) is gaining significant importance in the decision process due to a mix of various areas, including Computer Science, Machine Learning, Math and Statistics, domain/business knowledge, software development, and traditional research. In the business field, DS's application allows using scientific methods, processes, algorithms, and systems to extract knowledge and insights from structured and unstructured data to support the decision process. After collecting the data, it is crucial to discover the knowledge. In this step, Knowledge Discovery (KD) tasks are used to create knowledge from structured and unstructured sources (e.g., text, data, and images). The output needs to be in a readable and interpretable format. It must represent knowledge in a manner that facilitates inferencing. KD is applied in several areas, such as education, health, accounting, energy, and public administration. This book includes fourteen excellent articles which discuss this trending topic and present innovative solutions to show the importance of Data Science and Knowledge Discovery to researchers, managers, industry, society, and other communities. The chapters address several topics like Data mining, Deep Learning, Data Visualization and Analytics, Semantic data, Geospatial and Spatio-Temporal Data, Data Augmentation and Text Mining

    "They Don't Come With a Handbook":Exploring Design Opportunities for Supporting Parent-Child Interaction around Emotions in the Family Context

    Get PDF
    Parenting practices have a profound effect on childrenโ€™s well-being and are a core target of several psychological interventions for child mental health. However, there is only limited understanding in HCI so far about how to design socio-technical systems that could support positive shifts in parent-child social practices in situ. This paper focuses on parental socialisation of emotion as an exemplar context in which to explore this question. We present a two-step study, combining theory-driven identification of plausible design directions, with co-design workshops with 22 parents of children aged 6-10 years. Our data suggest the potential for technology-enabled systems that aim to facilitate positive changes in parent-child social practices in situ, and highlights a number of plausible design directions to explore in future work

    Examining Cognitive Empathy Elements within AI Chatbots for Healthcare Systems

    Get PDF
    Empathy is an essential part of communication in healthcare. It is a multidimensional concept and the two key dimensions: emotional and cognitive empathy allow clinicians to understand a patientโ€™s situation, reasoning, and feelings clearly (Mercer and Reynolds, 2002). As artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being used in healthcare for many routine tasks, accurate diagnoses, and complex treatment plans, it is becoming more crucial to incorporate clinical empathy into patient-faced AI systems. Unless patients perceive that the AI is understanding their situation, the communication between patient and AI may not sustain efficiently. AI may not really exhibit any emotional empathy at present, but it has the capability to exhibit cognitive empathy by communicating how it can understand patientsโ€™ reasoning, perspectives, and point of view. In my dissertation, I examine this issue across three separate lab experiments and one interview study. At first, I developed AI Cognitive Empathy Scale (AICES) and tested all empathy (emotional and cognitive) components together in a simulated scenario against control for patient-AI interaction for diagnosis purposes. In the second experiment, I tested the empathy components separately against control in different simulated scenarios. I identified six cognitive empathy elements from the interview study with first-time mothers, two of these elements were unique from the past literature. In the final lab experiment, I tested different cognitive empathy components separately based on the results from the interview study in simulated scenarios to examine which element emerges as the most effective. Finally, I developed a conceptual model of cognitive empathy for patient-AI interaction connecting the past literature and the observations from my studies. Overall, cognitive empathy elements show promise to create a shared understanding in patients-AI communication that may lead to increased patient satisfaction and willingness to use AI systems for initial diagnosis purposes
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore