The complexity of Boolean surjective general-valued CSPs

Valued constraint satisfaction problems (VCSPs) are discrete optimisation problems with a $(\mathbb{Q}\cup\{\infty\})$-valued objective function given as a sum of fixed-arity functions. In Boolean surjective VCSPs, variables take on labels from $D=\{0,1\}$ and an optimal assignment is required to use both labels from $D$. Examples include the classical global Min-Cut problem in graphs and the Minimum Distance problem studied in coding theory. We establish a dichotomy theorem and thus give a complete complexity classification of Boolean surjective VCSPs with respect to exact solvability. Our work generalises the dichotomy for $\{0,\infty\}$-valued constraint languages (corresponding to surjective decision CSPs) obtained by Creignou and H\'ebrard. For the maximisation problem of $\mathbb{Q}_{\geq 0}$-valued surjective VCSPs, we also establish a dichotomy theorem with respect to approximability. Unlike in the case of Boolean surjective (decision) CSPs, there appears a novel tractable class of languages that is trivial in the non-surjective setting. This newly discovered tractable class has an interesting mathematical structure related to downsets and upsets. Our main contribution is identifying this class and proving that it lies on the borderline of tractability. A crucial part of our proof is a polynomial-time algorithm for enumerating all near-optimal solutions to a generalised Min-Cut problem, which might be of independent interest.Comment: v5: small corrections and improved presentatio

The power of Sherali-Adams relaxations for general-valued CSPs

We give a precise algebraic characterisation of the power of Sherali-Adams relaxations for solvability of valued constraint satisfaction problems to optimality. The condition is that of bounded width which has already been shown to capture the power of local consistency methods for decision CSPs and the power of semidefinite programming for robust approximation of CSPs. Our characterisation has several algorithmic and complexity consequences. On the algorithmic side, we show that several novel and many known valued constraint languages are tractable via the third level of the Sherali-Adams relaxation. For the known languages, this is a significantly simpler algorithm than the previously obtained ones. On the complexity side, we obtain a dichotomy theorem for valued constraint languages that can express an injective unary function. This implies a simple proof of the dichotomy theorem for conservative valued constraint languages established by Kolmogorov and Zivny [JACM'13], and also a dichotomy theorem for the exact solvability of Minimum-Solution problems. These are generalisations of Minimum-Ones problems to arbitrary finite domains. Our result improves on several previous classifications by Khanna et al. [SICOMP'00], Jonsson et al. [SICOMP'08], and Uppman [ICALP'13].Comment: Full version of an ICALP'15 paper (arXiv:1502.05301

IST Austria Thesis

An instance of the Constraint Satisfaction Problem (CSP) is given by a finite set of variables, a finite domain of labels, and a set of constraints, each constraint acting on a subset of the variables. The goal is to find an assignment of labels to its variables that satisfies all constraints (or decide whether one exists). If we allow more general “soft” constraints, which come with (possibly infinite) costs of particular assignments, we obtain instances from a richer class called Valued Constraint Satisfaction Problem (VCSP). There the goal is to find an assignment with minimum total cost. In this thesis, we focus (assuming that P 6 = NP) on classifying computational com- plexity of CSPs and VCSPs under certain restricting conditions. Two results are the core content of the work. In one of them, we consider VCSPs parametrized by a constraint language, that is the set of “soft” constraints allowed to form the instances, and finish the complexity classification modulo (missing pieces of) complexity classification for analogously parametrized CSP. The other result is a generalization of Edmonds’ perfect matching algorithm. This generalization contributes to complexity classfications in two ways. First, it gives a new (largest known) polynomial-time solvable class of Boolean CSPs in which every variable may appear in at most two constraints and second, it settles full classification of Boolean CSPs with planar drawing (again parametrized by a constraint language)