309,315 research outputs found
Mapping Big Data into Knowledge Space with Cognitive Cyber-Infrastructure
Big data research has attracted great attention in science, technology,
industry and society. It is developing with the evolving scientific paradigm,
the fourth industrial revolution, and the transformational innovation of
technologies. However, its nature and fundamental challenge have not been
recognized, and its own methodology has not been formed. This paper explores
and answers the following questions: What is big data? What are the basic
methods for representing, managing and analyzing big data? What is the
relationship between big data and knowledge? Can we find a mapping from big
data into knowledge space? What kind of infrastructure is required to support
not only big data management and analysis but also knowledge discovery, sharing
and management? What is the relationship between big data and science paradigm?
What is the nature and fundamental challenge of big data computing? A
multi-dimensional perspective is presented toward a methodology of big data
computing.Comment: 59 page
Hypotheses, evidence and relationships: The HypER approach for representing scientific knowledge claims
Biological knowledge is increasingly represented as a collection of (entity-relationship-entity) triplets. These are queried, mined, appended to papers, and published. However, this representation ignores the argumentation contained within a paper and the relationships between hypotheses, claims and evidence put forth in the article. In this paper, we propose an alternate view of the research article as a network of 'hypotheses and evidence'. Our knowledge representation focuses on scientific discourse as a rhetorical activity, which leads to a different direction in the development of tools and processes for modeling this discourse. We propose to extract knowledge from the article to allow the construction of a system where a specific scientific claim is connected, through trails of meaningful relationships, to experimental evidence. We discuss some current efforts and future plans in this area
Astrophysicists and physicists as creators of ArXiv-based commenting resources for their research communities. An initial survey
This paper conveys the outcomes of what results to be the first, though
initial, overview of commenting platforms and related 2.0 resources born within
and for the astrophysical community (from 2004 to 2016). Experiences were
added, mainly in the physics domain, for a total of 22 major items, including
four epijournals, and four supplementary resources, thus casting some light
onto an unexpected richness and consonance of endeavours. These experiences
rest almost entirely on the contents of the database ArXiv, which adds to its
merits that of potentially setting the grounds for web 2.0 resources, and
research behaviours, to be explored.
Most of the experiences retrieved are UK and US based, but the resulting
picture is international, as various European countries, China and Australia
have been actively involved.
Final remarks about creation patterns and outcome of these resources are
outlined. The results integrate the previous studies according to which the web
2.0 is presently of limited use for communication in astrophysics and vouch for
a role of researchers in the shaping of their own professional communication
tools that is greater than expected. Collaterally, some aspects of ArXiv s
recent pathway towards partial inclusion of web 2.0 features are touched upon.
Further investigation is hoped for.Comment: Journal article 16 page
- …