Enhancing the collaboration of earthquake engineering research infrastructures

Towards stronger international collaboration of earthquake engineering research infrastructures International collaboration and mobility of researchers is a means for maximising the efficiency of use of research infrastructures. The European infrastructures are committed to widen joint research and access to their facilities. This is relevant to European framework for research and innovation, the single market and the competitiveness of the construction industry.JRC.G.4-European laboratory for structural assessmen

1st year EFAST annual report

The present report provides information about the activities conducted during the 1st year of the EFAST project. The first chapter is dedicated to describe the inquiries conducted at the beginning of the project and to briefly summarise the main results. The second chapter is dedicated to the first EFAST workshop where some of the leading scientists in the field of earthquake engineering have met to discuss about the need and the technologies related to earthquake engineering. The third chapter contains a state of the art and future direction in seismic testing and simulation. The final chapter is dedicated to describe the preliminary design of the web portal of the future testing facility.JRC.DG.G.5-European laboratory for structural assessmen

Parametric variation of a coupled pendulum-oscillator system using real-time dynamic substructuring

In this paper, we present results from real-time dynamic substructuring tests used to model the dynamics of a coupled pendulum–oscillator system. The substructuring technique is particularly suitable for systems where the nonlinear and linear parts of the system can be separated. The nonlinear part is built full size and tested physically (the substructure) while the linear part is simulated numerically. Then, in order to replicate the dynamics of the complete system the substructure and the numerical model must be coupled in real time. In this study, we demonstrate how real-time dynamic substructure testing can be used to model systems with strongly nonlinear behaviour using parametric variation. We show that the substructuring results give good qualitative and quantitative agreement with purely numerical simulations of the complete system for a range of parameters values. This includes single parameter bifurcation diagrams, some of which cannot be obtained from a full physical experiment. We also briefly discuss the effects of delay and noise on the stability of the substructured system, and how these effects can be mitigated. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

2nd EFAST Workshop, Reliable Testing of Seismic Performance

The EFAST project consisted of a design study of a new major seismic testing facility in Europe that will be comparable with important testing installations that are now working or under construction in Japan, U.S.A., China and Taiwan. The presentations by invited experts during the 2nd EFAST Workshop, which was held by the end of the project, emphasized the basic idea that experiments are necessary because reliable engineering cannot still rely only on numerical predictions. The relation between the experimental research and the improvements of the buildings codes in the last decades has also suggested that a consistent experimental activity is fundamental for properly understanding and predicting the real behaviour of complex structural elements. Today in many fields, as in the assessment of nuclear facilities for example, more reliability is required in order to increase the safety, which leads to a newer impulse for experimental testing of components, subsystems, soil-structure interaction effects and so on. The necessity and characteristics of the available testing methods was reviewed with up-to-date examples and studies on aspects such as shaking table, pseudo-dynamic and hybrid testing methods, centrifuge facilities, scale models, soil-structure interaction, control strategies and performance. Within the EFAST design study as it was presented, several solutions are proposed for the future experimental facility, among which the reference one is a laboratory composed, mainly, of a high performance shaking table array and a reaction structure where both traditional (pseudo-static/dynamic) and innovative testing techniques (e.g. real time hybrid testing) can be applied and combined. These shaking tables can be moved in the trench and can be also rigidly coupled between them, if necessary. A large SDOF shaking table for geotechnical studies is also foreseen in such solution. The discussion of the different solutions covered aspects such as costs (including safety, maintenance and operation), demand of experiments, flexibility and performance among others.JRC.G.5-European laboratory for structural assessmen

Process modelling and adaptive control of a metal milling process

EThOS - Electronic Theses Online ServiceGBUnited Kingdo

Multi-axial Real-time Hybrid Simulation Framework for Testing Nonlinear Structural Systems with Multiple Boundary Interfaces

Hybrid simulation is a widely accepted laboratory testing approach that partitions a proposed structure into numerical and physical substructures, for a space- and cost-effective testing method. Structural elements that are expected to remain in the linear elastic range are usually modeled numerically, while computationally intractable nonlinear elements are tested physically. The loads and conditions at the boundaries between the numerical and physical substructures are imposed by servo-hydraulic actuators, with the responses measured by loadcells and displacement transducers. Traditionally, these actuators impose boundary condition displacements at slow speeds, while damping and inertial components for the physical specimen are numerically calculated. This slow application of the boundary conditions neglects rate-dependent behavior of the physical specimen. Real-time hybrid simulation (RTHS) is an alternative to slow speed hybrid simulation approach, where the responses of numerical substructure are calculated and imposed on the physical substructure at real world natural hazard excitation speeds. Damping, inertia, and rate-dependent material effects are incorporated in the physical substructure as a result of real-time testing. For a general substructure, the boundary interface has six degrees-of-freedom (DOF); therefore, an actuation system that can apply multi-axial loads is required. In these experiments, the boundary conditions at the interface between the physical and numerical substructures are imposed by two or more actuators. Significant dynamic coupling can be present between the actuators in such setups. Kinematic transformations are required for operation of each actuator to achieve desired boundary conditions. Furthermore, each actuator possesses inherent dynamics that needs appropriate compensation to ensure an accurate and stable operation. Most existing RTHS applications to date have involved the substructuring of the reference structures into numerical and physical components at a single interface with a one-DOF boundary condition and force imposed and measured. Multi-DOF boundary conditions have been explored in a few applications, however a general six-DOF stable implementation has never been achieved. A major research gap in the RTHS domain is the development of a multi-axial RTHS framework capable of handling six DOF boundary conditions and forces, as well as presence of multiple physical specimens and numerical-to-physical interfaces. In this dissertation, a multi-axial real-time hybrid simulation (maRTHS) framework is developed for realistic nonlinear dynamic assessment of structures under natural hazard excitation. The framework is comprised of numerical and physical substructures, actuator-dynamics compensation, and kinematic transformations between Cartesian and actuator/transducer coordinates. The numerical substructure is compiled on a real-time embedded system, comprised of a microcontroller setup, with onboard memory and processing, that computes the response of finite element models of the structural system, which are then communicated with the hardware setup via the input-output peripherals. The physical substructure is composed of a multi-actuator boundary condition box, loadcells, displacement transducers, and one or more physical specimens. The proposed compensation is a model-based strategy based on the linearized identified models of individual actuators. The concepts of the model-based compensation approach are first validated in a shake table study, and then applied to single and multi-axis RTHS developments. The capabilities of the proposed maRTHS framework are demonstrated via the multi-axial load and boundary condition boxes (LBCBs) at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, via two illustrative examples. First, the maRTHS algorithm including the decoupled controller, and kinematic transformation processes are validated. In this study, a moment frame structure is partitioned into numerical beam-column finite element model, and a physical column with an LBCB boundary condition. This experiment is comprised of six DOFs and excitation is only applied in the plane of the moment frame. Next, the maRTHS framework is subjected to a more sophisticated testing environment involving a multi-span curved bridge structure. In this second example, two LBCBs are utilized for testing of two physical piers, and excitation is applied bi-directionally. Results from the illustrative examples are verified against numerical simulations. The results demonstrate the accuracy and promising nature of the proposed state-of-the-art framework for maRTHS for nonlinear dynamic testing of structural systems using multiple boundary points.Ope

Multi-axial real-time hybrid simulation framework for testing nonlinear structure systems with multiple boundary interfaces

Hybrid simulation is a widely accepted laboratory testing approach that partitions a proposed structure into numerical and physical substructures, for a space- and cost-effective testing method. Structural elements that are expected to remain in the linear elastic range are usually modeled numerically, while computationally intractable nonlinear elements are tested physically. The loads and conditions at the boundaries between the numerical and physical substructures are imposed by servo-hydraulic actuators, with the responses measured by load cells and displacement transducers. Traditionally, these actuators impose boundary condition displacements at slow speeds, while damping and inertial components for the physical specimen are numerically calculated. This slow application of the boundary conditions neglects the rate-dependent behavior of the physical specimen. Real-time hybrid simulation (RTHS) is an alternative to slow speed hybrid simulation approach, where the responses of the numerical substructure are calculated and imposed on the physical substructure at real-world natural hazard excitation speeds. Damping, inertia, and rate-dependent material effects are incorporated in the physical substructure as a result of real-time testing. For a general substructure, the boundary interface has six degrees-of-freedom (DOF); therefore, an actuation system that can apply multi-axial loads is required. In these experiments, the boundary conditions at the interface between the physical and numerical substructures are imposed by two or more actuators. Significant dynamic coupling can be present between the actuators in such setups. Kinematic transformations are required for the operation of each actuator to achieve desired boundary conditions. Furthermore, each actuator possesses inherent dynamics that need appropriate compensation to ensure an accurate and stable operation. Most existing RTHS applications to date have involved the substructuring of the reference structures into numerical and physical components at a single interface with a one-DOF boundary condition and force imposed and measured. Multi-DOF boundary conditions have been explored in a few applications; however a general six-DOF stable implementation has never been achieved. A major research gap in the RTHS domain is the development of a multi-axial RTHS framework capable of handling six DOF boundary conditions and forces, as well as the presence of multiple physical specimens and numerical-to-physical interfaces. In this dissertation, a multi-axial real-time hybrid simulation (maRTHS) framework is developed for realistic nonlinear dynamic assessment of structures under natural hazard excitation. The framework is comprised of numerical and physical substructures, actuator-dynamics compensation, and kinematic transformations between Cartesian and actuator/transducer coordinates. The numerical substructure is compiled on a real-time embedded system, comprised of a microcontroller setup, with onboard memory and processing, that computes the response of finite element models of the structural system, which are then communicated with the hardware setup via the input-output peripherals. The physical substructure is composed of a multi-actuator boundary condition box, loadcells, displacement transducers, and one or more physical specimens. The proposed compensation is a model-based strategy based on the linearized identified models of individual actuators. The concepts of the model-based compensation approach are first validated in a shake table study, and then applied to single and multi-axis RTHS developments. The capabilities of the proposed maRTHS framework are demonstrated via the multi-axial load and boundary condition boxes (LBCBs) at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, via two illustrative examples. First, the maRTHS algorithm including the decoupled controller, and kinematic transformation processes are validated. In this study, a moment frame structure is partitioned into numerical beam-column finite element model, and a physical column with an LBCB boundary condition. This experiment is comprised of six DOFs and excitation is only applied in the plane of the moment frame. Next, the maRTHS framework is subjected to a more sophisticated testing environment involving a multi-span curved bridge structure. In this second example, two LBCBs are utilized for testing of two physical piers, and excitation is applied bi-directionally. Results from the illustrative examples are verified against numerical simulations. The results demonstrate the accuracy and promising nature of the proposed state-of-the-art framework for maRTHS for nonlinear dynamic testing of structural systems using multiple boundary points