A survey on signature-based Gr\"obner basis computations

This paper is a survey on the area of signature-based Gr\"obner basis algorithms that was initiated by Faug\`ere's F5 algorithm in 2002. We explain the general ideas behind the usage of signatures. We show how to classify the various known variants by 3 different orderings. For this we give translations between different notations and show that besides notations many approaches are just the same. Moreover, we give a general description of how the idea of signatures is quite natural when performing the reduction process using linear algebra. This survey shall help to outline this field of active research.Comment: 53 pages, 8 figures, 11 table

Signature Gr\"obner bases in free algebras over rings

We generalize signature Gr\"obner bases, previously studied in the free algebra over a field or polynomial rings over a ring, to ideals in the mixed algebra $R[x_1,...,x_k]\langle y_1,\dots,y_n \rangle$ where $R$ is a principal ideal domain. We give an algorithm for computing them, combining elements from the theory of commutative and noncommutative (signature) Gr\"obner bases, and prove its correctness. Applications include extensions of the free algebra with commutative variables, e.g., for homogenization purposes or for performing ideal theoretic operations such as intersections, and computations over $\mathbb{Z}$ as universal proofs over fields of arbitrary characteristic. By extending the signature cover criterion to our setting, our algorithm also lifts some technical restrictions from previous noncommutative signature-based algorithms, now allowing, e.g., elimination orderings. We provide a prototype implementation for the case when $R$ is a field, and show that our algorithm for the mixed algebra is more efficient than classical approaches using existing algorithms.Comment: 10 page

Axioms for a theory of signature bases

Twenty years after the discovery of the F5 algorithm, Gr\"obner bases with signatures are still challenging to understand and to adapt to different settings. This contrasts with Buchberger's algorithm, which we can bend in many directions keeping correctness and termination obvious. I propose an axiomatic approach to Gr\"obner bases with signatures with the purpose of uncoupling the theory and the algorithms, and giving general results applicable in many different settings (e.g. Gr\"obner for submodules, F4-style reduction, noncommutative rings, non-Noetherian settings, etc.)