3,901 research outputs found

    DATA DRIVEN PERFORMANCE EVALUATION IN SHIPBUILDING

    Get PDF
    Rapid development in data science keeps paving the way for use of data for many purposes in shipbuilding, both for product development and production, such as Industry 4.0 have been developing many industries. Similar to other industries the evaluation of performance in shipbuilding is the key to success which is closely connected to productivity and lowered costs. Data mining and analysis techniques are used to create effective algorithms to evaluate the performance, also by means of cost estimation based on parametric methods. However, it is usually not very clear how data are collected, organised and prepared for analysing and deriving valuable knowledge as well as algorithms. In most of the cases, having this data requires either continuous investment in expensive software or expensive external expertise which are generally not available for small and medium size shipyards. In this study, considering the needs of the small and medium sized shipyards, a step-by-step methodology is proposed which could be easily applied with widely available low budget software. The application is demonstrated with a case to evaluate the performance of early phase structural design with a data driven cost estimation algorithm

    Maintenance/repair and production-oriented life cycle cost/earning model for ship structural optimisation during conceptual design stage

    Get PDF
    The aim of this paper is to investigate the effect of the change in structural weight due to optimisation experiments on life cycle cost and earning elements using the life cycle cost/earning model, which was developed for structure optimisation. The relation between structural variables and relevant cost/earning elements are explored and discussed in detail. The developed model is restricted to the relevant life cycle cost and earning elements, namely production cost, periodic maintenance cost, fuel oil cost, operational earning and dismantling earning. Therefore it is important to emphasise here that the cost/earning figure calculated through the developed methodology will not be a full life cycle cost/earning value for a subject vessel, but will be the relevant life cycle cost/earning value. As one of the main focuses of this paper is the maintenance/repair issue, the data was collected from a number of ship operators and was solely used for the purpose of regression analysis. An illustrative example for a chemical tanker is provided to show the applicability of the proposed approac

    ์กฐ์„ ์†Œ ์†Œ์กฐ๋ฆฝ ์ฃผํŒ ๋ฐฐ์น˜ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ๊ณ„ํš ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (์„์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๊ณต๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ์กฐ์„ ํ•ด์–‘๊ณตํ•™๊ณผ, 2021. 2. ์šฐ์ข…ํ›ˆ.In the shipbuilding subassembly process, space is one of the main resource constraints limiting production capacity. To efficiently manage the space resource, how subassembly parts will occupy the workshop floor need to be analyzed before production. In this study, a methodology of controlling the subassembly space resource is proposed. In this methodology, first the impact of space on the production capacity for a given time period is analyzed. This analysis is performed through a framework of discrete event simulation modelling the subassembly process using subassembly part scheduling algorithm and spatial arrangement planning algorithm. The production schedules feasibility in terms of space resource utilization is examined through the simulation model. Second, a detailed subassembly part arrangement layout is generated using a genetic algorithm based spatial arrangement algorithm. The algorithm is used to efficiently utilize the work area and accurately predict the amount of area required for a subassembly production lot. After the methodology is presented, a case study of the simulation model is analyzed, and the performance of the genetic algorithm based spatial arrangement algorithm is evaluated.์กฐ์„ ์†Œ์˜ ์†Œ์กฐ๋ฆฝ ๊ณต์ •์—์„œ ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ์ž์›์€ ์ƒ์‚ฐ ๋Šฅ๋ ฅ์„ ๊ฒฐ์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ์ฃผ์š” ์ž์›์ด๋‹ค. ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ์ž์›์„ ํšจ์œจ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ด€๋ฆฌํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ์ƒ์‚ฐ ๊ณ„ํš ๊ฒ€ํ†  ๋‹จ๊ณ„์—์„œ ์†Œ์กฐ๋ฆฝํ’ˆ ๋ฐฐ์น˜ ์œ„์น˜ ๋ฐ ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ํ™œ์šฉ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ถ„์„์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ด์‚ฐ์‚ฌ๊ฑด ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง ๋ฐ ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ๋ฐฐ์น˜ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์— ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ํ•œ ์†Œ์กฐ๋ฆฝ ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ์ž์› ํ™œ์šฉ ๊ณ„ํš์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก ์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ๊ณผ ๋ชจ๋ธ ๋‚ด ํƒ‘์žฌ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ๋Š” ์†Œ์กฐ๋ฆฝ ๊ณ„ํš ๋ฐ ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ๋ฐฐ์น˜ ๋ชจ๋“ˆ์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ƒ์‚ฐ ๊ณ„ํš ๊ธฐ๊ฐ„๋™์•ˆ์˜ ์ƒ์‚ฐ์„ฑ ๋ฐ ๊ณ„ํš์ค€์ˆ˜์œจ์— ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ์ž์›์ด ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ƒ์‚ฐ ๊ณ„ํš์˜ ํƒ€๋‹น์„ฑ์„ ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ฐœ์„  ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ ๋„์ถœ์— ๋„์›€์ด ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋‹ค์Œ์œผ๋กœ ์œ ์ „์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์— ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ํ•œ ์†Œ์กฐ๋ฆฝ ์ฃผํŒ ๋ฐฐ์น˜ ๋ ˆ์ด์•„์›ƒ ์ƒ์„ฑ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜ ๋ฐ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก ์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ์†Œ์กฐ๋ฆฝ ์ฃผํŒ ๋ฐฐ์น˜ ๋ ˆ์ด์•„์›ƒ ์ƒ์„ฑ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์†Œ์กฐ๋ฆฝ ์ž‘์—…์žฅ ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ํ™œ์šฉ๋ฅ ์„ ๋†’์ผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ์ž‘์—…์— ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ๊ณต๊ฐ„์„ ์ •ํ™•ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋งˆ์ง€๋ง‰์œผ๋กœ ์†Œ์กฐ๋ฆฝ ์ƒ์‚ฐ ์‚ฌ๋ก€๋ฅผ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋กœ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๊ณ  ์†Œ์กฐ๋ฆฝ ์ฃผํŒ ๋ฐฐ์น˜ ๋ ˆ์ด์•„์›ƒ ์ƒ์„ฑ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์˜ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.1. Introduction 1 1.1 Study background 1 1.2 Past research 4 1.3 Research scope and methodology 6 2. Defining the subassembly process 8 2.1 Defining the part object 8 2.2 Defining the workshop 11 2.3 Defining the scheduling methodology 13 3. Developing the simulation model 15 3.1 Representing the product object 15 3.2 Subassembly part scheduling algorithm 18 3.3 Spatial arrangement planning algorithm 22 3.3.1 Factors in evaluating algorithm result 29 3.4 Simulation case study and analysis 30 3.5 System based on simulation model 35 4. Detailed spatial arrangement 38 4.1 Motivation and relation to simulation model 38 4.2 Algorithm structure and details 41 4.3 Detailed arrangement layout system 47 4.4 Algorithm evaluation and analysis 48 5. Conclusion 51Maste

    DATA MINING METHODOLOGY FOR DETERMINING THE OPTIMAL MODEL OF COST PREDICTION IN SHIP INTERIM PRODUCT ASSEMBLY

    Get PDF
    In order to accurately predict costs of the thousands of interim products that are assembled in shipyards, it is necessary to use skilled engineers to develop detailed Gantt charts for each interim product separately which takes many hours. It is helpful to develop a prediction tool to estimate the cost of interim products accurately and quickly without the need for skilled engineers. This will drive down shipyard costs and improve competitiveness. Data mining is used extensively for developing prediction models in other industries. Since ships consist of thousands of interim products, it is logical to develop a data mining methodology for a shipyard or any other manufacturing industry where interim products are produced. The methodology involves analysis of existing interim products and data collection. Pre-processing and principal component analysis is done to make the data โ€œuser-friendlyโ€ for later prediction processing and the development of both accurate and robust models. The support vector machine is demonstrated as the better model when there are a lower number of tuples. However as the number of tuples is increased to over 10000, then the artificial neural network model is recommended

    ๋ฉ”ํƒ€ ํœด๋ฆฌ์Šคํ‹ฑ ์ตœ์ ํ™”๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ๊ธฐ๊ณ„ํ•™์Šต ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์„ ๋ฐ• ๊ฑด์กฐ ๊ณต์ • ๋ฆฌ๋“œ ํƒ€์ž„ ์˜ˆ์ธก

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(์„์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๊ณต๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ์กฐ์„ ํ•ด์–‘๊ณตํ•™๊ณผ, 2021.8. ํ•˜์˜ค์œ ์ฃผ.In the shipbuilding industry, each production process has a respective lead time; that is, the duration between start and finish times. Lead time is basic data that is necessary for high-efficiency production planning and systematic production management. Therefore, lead time must be accurate. However, the traditional method of lead time management is not scientific because it mostly makes the plan by calculating the average lead times derived from historical data. Therefore, to understand the complex relationship between lead time and other influencing factors, this study proposes to use machine learning (ML) algorithms, support vector machine (SVM) and artificial neural network (ANN), which are frequently applied in prediction fields. Moreover, to improve prediction accuracy, this study proposes to apply meta-heuristic algorithms to optimize the parameters of the ML models. This thesis builds hybrid models, including meta-heuristic-ANN, meta-heuristic-SVM models. In addition, this study compares modelโ€™s performance with each other. In searching for the ML modelโ€™s parameters, the results point out that the new self-organizing hierarchical particle swarm optimization (PSO) with jumping time-varying acceleration coefficients (NHPSO-JTVAC) algorithm is superior in terms of performance. More importantly, the test results demonstrate that the integrated models, based on NHPSO-JTVAC, have the smallest mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) test error in the three shipyard block process data sets, 11.79%, 16.03% and 16.45%, respectively. The results also demonstrate that the built models based on NHPSO-JTVAC can achieve further meaningful enhancements in terms of prediction accuracy. Overall, the NHPSOโ€“JTVAC-SVM, NHPSOโ€“JTVAC-ANN models are feasible for predicting the lead time in shipbuilding.์กฐ์„  ์‚ฐ์—…์—์„œ ๊ฐ ๊ณต์ •์€ ๋ฆฌ๋“œ ํƒ€์ž„์„ ๊ฐ€์ง„๋‹ค. ๋ฆฌ๋“œ ํƒ€์ž„์ด๋ž€ ๊ณต์ • ์‹œ์ž‘๊ณผ ์ข…๋ฃŒ ๊ฐ„์— ์‹œ๊ฐ„์œผ๋กœ, ๊ณ ํšจ์œจ์˜ ์ƒ์‚ฐ๊ณ„ํš๊ณผ ์ฒด๊ณ„์  ์ƒ์‚ฐ๊ด€๋ฆฌ๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋งค์šฐ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ์ง€ํ‘œ์ด๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ, ์ƒ์‚ฐ ๊ณ„ํš ๋‹จ๊ณ„์—์„œ ์ •ํ™•ํ•œ ๋ฆฌ๋“œํƒ€์ž„ ์˜ˆ์ธก์€ ๋‚ฉ๊ธฐ ์ค€์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ณ„ํš ์ˆ˜๋ฆฝ์„ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋งค์šฐ ์ค‘์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ์˜ˆ์ธก ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์€ ๊ณผ๊ฑฐ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์˜ ํ‰๊ท ๊ฐ’์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ–ˆ๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์ •ํ™•๋„๊ฐ€ ๋งค์šฐ ๋–จ์–ด์กŒ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋ฆฌ๋“œ ํƒ€์ž„๊ณผ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์˜ํ–ฅ ์š”์ธ ๊ฐ„์˜ ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์˜ˆ์ธก ๋ถ„์•ผ์—์„œ ์ž์ฃผ ์ ์šฉ๋˜๋Š” ๋จธ์‹  ๋Ÿฌ๋‹ (ML) ๋ชจ๋ธ์ธ ์„œํฌํŠธ ๋ฒกํ„ฐ ๋จธ์‹  (SVM) ๋ฐ ์ธ๊ณต ์‹ ๊ฒฝ๋ง (ANN) ์ ์šฉ์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ๊ธฐ๊ณ„ํ•™์Šต ๋ชจ๋ธ ์˜ˆ์ธก ์ •ํ™•๋„๋ฅผ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œํ‚ค๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋ฉ”ํƒ€ ํœด๋ฆฌ์Šคํ‹ฑ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ ์ ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์ตœ์ ํ™”ํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” meta-heuristics-ANN, meta-heuristics-SVM ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ํฌํ•จํ•˜๋Š” ํ•˜์ด๋ธŒ๋ฆฌ๋“œ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ๊ตฌ์ถ•ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋”๋ถˆ์–ด, ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๋ฉ”ํƒ€ ํœด๋ฆฌ์Šคํ‹ฑ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ์ตœ์ ํ™”๋œ ๊ธฐ๊ณ„ํ•™์Šต ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ์„œ๋กœ ๋น„๊ตํ•œ๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด, ML ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ํƒ์ƒ‰ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ณผ์ •์—์„œ particle swam optimization (PSO)์˜ enhanced ๋ฒ„์ „์ธ NHPSO-JTVAC ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์ด ํƒ์ƒ‰ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ๋ฉด์—์„œ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜๋ณด๋‹ค ์šฐ์ˆ˜ํ•˜๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ์•Œ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฟ๋งŒ ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ผ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์‚ดํŽด๋ณด๋ฉด NHPSO-JTVAC์— ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ํ•œ ํ•˜์ด๋ธŒ๋ฆฌ๋“œ ๋ชจ๋ธ์ด ์กฐ์„ ์†Œ ์„ธ ๊ฐœ์˜ ๋ธ”๋ก ๊ณต์ • ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์—์„œ (๊ฐ๊ฐ 11.79%, 16.03% ๋ฐ 16.45%) ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ž‘์€ MAPE ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ ์˜ค์ฐจ์ž„์„ ์•Œ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๊ฒƒ์€ NHPSO-JTVAC๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ๊ตฌ์ถ•๋œ ๋ชจ๋ธ์ด ์˜ˆ์ธก ์ •ํ™•๋„ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ์˜๋ฏธ ์žˆ๋Š” ํ–ฅ์ƒ์„ ๋” ๋‹ฌ์„ฑํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค€๋‹ค. ์ „๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ NHPSO-JTVAC-SVM, NHPSO-JTVAC-ANN ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ์กฐ์„ ์†Œ ๋ธ”๋ก ๊ณต์ •์˜ ๋ฆฌ๋“œ ํƒ€์ž„์„ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์ ํ•ฉํ•˜๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค.Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Background and Motivation 1 1.2 Related Works 3 1.2.1 Related Works for Lead Time Prediction 3 1.2.2 Related Works for Hybrid Predictive Model 4 1.3 Thesis Organization 6 Chapter 2 Machine Learning 7 2.1 Support Vector Machine 7 2.1.1 Support Vector Machine Algorithm 7 2.1.2 Hyperparameter Optimization for SVM 10 2.2 Artificial Neural Network 11 2.2.1 Artificial Neural Network Algorithm 11 2.2.2 Hyperparameter Optimization for ANN 15 Chapter 3 Meta-heuristic Optimization Algorithms 17 3.1 Particle Swarm Optimization 17 3.2 NHPSO-JTVAC: An Advanced Version of PSO 18 3.3 Bat Algorithm 19 3.4 Firefly Algorithm 21 3.5 Grasshopper Optimization Algorithm 22 3.6 Moth Search Algorithm 24 Chapter 4 Hybrid Artificial Intelligence Models 27 4.1 Hybrid Meta-heuristic-SVM Models 27 4.1.1 Hybrid PSO-SVM Model 29 4.1.2 Hybrid NHPSO-JTVAC-SVM Model 30 4.1.3 Hybrid BA-SVM Model 31 4.1.4 Hybrid FA-SVM Model 33 4.1.5 Hybrid GOA-SVM Model 34 4.1.6 Hybrid MSA-SVM Model 35 4.2 Hybrid Meta-heuristic-ANN Models 36 4.2.1 Hybrid PSO-ANN Model 38 4.2.2 Hybrid NHPSO-JTVAC-ANN Model 39 4.2.3 Hybrid BA-ANN Model 40 4.2.4 Hybrid FA-ANN Model 41 4.2.5 Hybrid GOA-ANN Model 42 4.2.6 Hybrid MSA-ANN Model 43 Chapter 5 Lead Time Prediction Based on Hybrid AI Models 44 5.1 Data and Preparation 44 5.1.1 Data Normalization 45 5.1.2 Feature Selection 45 5.2 Lead Time Prediction 46 5.3 Performance Metrics 47 Chapter 6 Experimental Results 49 6.1 Results Based on Hybrid SVM-based Models 49 6.2 Results Based on Hybrid ANN-based Models 55 6.3 Overall Results 60 Chapter 7 Conclusions and Future Works 62 Bibliography 63 Appendix A 68 Abstract in Korean 69์„

    Making a Miracle

    Get PDF

    MIG gas shielding : Economic savings without detriment to quality

    Get PDF
    Over the years a number of claims have been made related to potential savings of the shielding gas used in the MIG process. A number of work streams have been set up to consider such areas from a technical and economic standpoint. The use of small helium additions has particular benefits and despite an increase in unit cost, the overriding benefits are achieved in reduced manhour cost. A similar situation has been established when using a high frequency process to switch shielding gases during welding. The outcome from this was very similar to that already described. Overlaid on these has been the increasing use of a technique that visualises actual gas flow during welding by the use of laser backlighting. Some preliminary work in this area is described particularly related to the effect of drafts on the gas distribution. A recent development on the market place is a piece of equipment, which regulates the gas flow automatically and synchronously with the welding current. Gas savings in the region of 50-60% have been obtained. Data has been produced to illustrate these benefits. The potential benefit of developing a computational fluid dynamic model of the gas flow is also described, and early development stages of the model shown. However, there will always exist the very basic management need to minimise leaks from the gas delivery systems

    MULTIPURPOSE VESSEL FLEET FOR SHORT BLACK SEA SHIPPING THROUGH MULTIMODAL TRANSPORT CORRIDORS

    Get PDF
    A study about the requirements and cargo transportation demand in the Black Sea as part of a multimodal transportation frame is performed, estimating the potential need of a ship fleet of multipurpose ships. The study performs conceptual multipurpose vessel design and fleet sizing using the long-time experience and statistics in defining main dimensions of the ship and her hull form, resistance and propulsion, weights, stability, free-board, seakeeping and manoeuvrability, capital, operational and decommissioning expenditure, where the optimal design solution is obtained based on the energy efficiency, shipbuilding, operation, and resale costs at the end of the service life. A discussion about possible applications of a different fleet of ship sizes in improving the cargo transportation efficiency considers the vessel\u27s typical operational profile in such a way to maximise the economic impact conditional of the unsteady cargo flow and environmental impact

    Energy efficiency parametric design tool in the framework of holistic ship design optimization

    Get PDF
    Recent International Maritime Organization (IMO) decisions with respect to measures to reduce the emissions from maritime greenhouse gases (GHGs) suggest that the collaboration of all major stakeholders of shipbuilding and ship operations is required to address this complex techno-economical and highly political problem efficiently. This calls eventually for the development of proper design, operational knowledge, and assessment tools for the energy-efficient design and operation of ships, as suggested by the Second IMO GHG Study (2009). This type of coordination of the efforts of many maritime stakeholders, with often conflicting professional interests but ultimately commonly aiming at optimal ship design and operation solutions, has been addressed within a methodology developed in the EU-funded Logistics-Based (LOGBASED) Design Project (2004โ€“2007). Based on the knowledge base developed within this project, a new parametric design software tool (PDT) has been developed by the National Technical University of Athens, Ship Design Laboratory (NTUA-SDL), for implementing an energy efficiency design and management procedure. The PDT is an integral part of an earlier developed holistic ship design optimization approach by NTUA-SDL that addresses the multi-objective ship design optimization problem. It provides Pareto-optimum solutions and a complete mapping of the design space in a comprehensive way for the final assessment and decision by all the involved stakeholders. The application of the tool to the design of a large oil tanker and alternatively to container ships is elaborated in the presented paper
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore