36,968 research outputs found
Identification of Parametric Underspread Linear Systems and Super-Resolution Radar
Identification of time-varying linear systems, which introduce both
time-shifts (delays) and frequency-shifts (Doppler-shifts), is a central task
in many engineering applications. This paper studies the problem of
identification of underspread linear systems (ULSs), whose responses lie within
a unit-area region in the delay Doppler space, by probing them with a known
input signal. It is shown that sufficiently-underspread parametric linear
systems, described by a finite set of delays and Doppler-shifts, are
identifiable from a single observation as long as the time bandwidth product of
the input signal is proportional to the square of the total number of delay
Doppler pairs in the system. In addition, an algorithm is developed that
enables identification of parametric ULSs from an input train of pulses in
polynomial time by exploiting recent results on sub-Nyquist sampling for time
delay estimation and classical results on recovery of frequencies from a sum of
complex exponentials. Finally, application of these results to super-resolution
target detection using radar is discussed. Specifically, it is shown that the
proposed procedure allows to distinguish between multiple targets with very
close proximity in the delay Doppler space, resulting in a resolution that
substantially exceeds that of standard matched-filtering based techniques
without introducing leakage effects inherent in recently proposed compressed
sensing-based radar methods.Comment: Revised version of a journal paper submitted to IEEE Trans. Signal
Processing: 30 pages, 17 figure
Elicitability and backtesting: Perspectives for banking regulation
Conditional forecasts of risk measures play an important role in internal
risk management of financial institutions as well as in regulatory capital
calculations. In order to assess forecasting performance of a risk measurement
procedure, risk measure forecasts are compared to the realized financial losses
over a period of time and a statistical test of correctness of the procedure is
conducted. This process is known as backtesting. Such traditional backtests are
concerned with assessing some optimality property of a set of risk measure
estimates. However, they are not suited to compare different risk estimation
procedures. We investigate the proposal of comparative backtests, which are
better suited for method comparisons on the basis of forecasting accuracy, but
necessitate an elicitable risk measure. We argue that supplementing traditional
backtests with comparative backtests will enhance the existing trading book
regulatory framework for banks by providing the correct incentive for accuracy
of risk measure forecasts. In addition, the comparative backtesting framework
could be used by banks internally as well as by researchers to guide selection
of forecasting methods. The discussion focuses on three risk measures,
Value-at-Risk, expected shortfall and expectiles, and is supported by a
simulation study and data analysis
Optimal cross-validation in density estimation with the -loss
We analyze the performance of cross-validation (CV) in the density estimation
framework with two purposes: (i) risk estimation and (ii) model selection. The
main focus is given to the so-called leave--out CV procedure (Lpo), where
denotes the cardinality of the test set. Closed-form expressions are
settled for the Lpo estimator of the risk of projection estimators. These
expressions provide a great improvement upon -fold cross-validation in terms
of variability and computational complexity. From a theoretical point of view,
closed-form expressions also enable to study the Lpo performance in terms of
risk estimation. The optimality of leave-one-out (Loo), that is Lpo with ,
is proved among CV procedures used for risk estimation. Two model selection
frameworks are also considered: estimation, as opposed to identification. For
estimation with finite sample size , optimality is achieved for large
enough [with ] to balance the overfitting resulting from the
structure of the model collection. For identification, model selection
consistency is settled for Lpo as long as is conveniently related to the
rate of convergence of the best estimator in the collection: (i) as
with a parametric rate, and (ii) with some
nonparametric estimators. These theoretical results are validated by simulation
experiments.Comment: Published in at http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/14-AOS1240 the Annals of
Statistics (http://www.imstat.org/aos/) by the Institute of Mathematical
Statistics (http://www.imstat.org
- …