Contract Design for Energy Demand Response

Power companies such as Southern California Edison (SCE) uses Demand Response (DR) contracts to incentivize consumers to reduce their power consumption during periods when demand forecast exceeds supply. Current mechanisms in use offer contracts to consumers independent of one another, do not take into consideration consumers' heterogeneity in consumption profile or reliability, and fail to achieve high participation. We introduce DR-VCG, a new DR mechanism that offers a flexible set of contracts (which may include the standard SCE contracts) and uses VCG pricing. We prove that DR-VCG elicits truthful bids, incentivizes honest preparation efforts, enables efficient computation of allocation and prices. With simple fixed-penalty contracts, the optimization goal of the mechanism is an upper bound on probability that the reduction target is missed. Extensive simulations show that compared to the current mechanism deployed in by SCE, the DR-VCG mechanism achieves higher participation, increased reliability, and significantly reduced total expenses.Comment: full version of paper accepted to IJCAI'1

A Scoring Rule-Based Mechanism for Aggregate Demand Prediction in the Smart Grid

This paper presents a novel scoring rule-based strictly dominant incentive compatible mechanism that encourages agents to produce costly estimates of future events and report them truthfully to a centre. Whereas prior work has assumed a fixed budget for payment towards agents, this work makes use of prior information held by the centre and assumes a budget that is determined by the savings made through the use of the agents' information over the centre's own prior information. This mechanism is compared to a simple benchmark mechanism wherein the savings are divided equally among all home agents, and a cooperative solution wherein agents act to maximise social welfare. Empirical analysis is performed in which the mechanism is applied to a simulation of the smart grid whereby an aggregator agent must use home agents' information to optimally purchase electricity. It is shown that this mechanism achieves up to 77% of the social welfare achieved by the cooperative solution

Mechanism design for information aggregation within the smart grid

The introduction of a smart electricity grid enables a greater amount of information exchange between consumers and their suppliers. This can be exploited by novel aggregation services to save money by more optimally purchasing electricity for those consumers. Now, if the aggregation service pays consumers for said information, then both parties could benefit. However, any such payment mechanism must be carefully designed to encourage the customers (say, home-owners) to exert effort in gathering information and then to truthfully report it to the aggregator. This work develops a model of the information aggregation problem where each home has an autonomous home agent, which acts on its behalf to gather information and report it to the aggregation agent. The aggregator has its own historical consumption information for each house under its service, so it can make an imprecise estimate of the future aggregate consumption of the houses for which it is responsible. However, it uses the information sent by the home agents in order to make a more precise estimate and, in return, gives each home agent a reward whose amount is determined by the payment mechanism in use by the aggregator. There are three desirable properties of a mechanism that this work considers: budget balance (the aggregator does not reward the agents more than it saves), incentive compatibility (agents are encouraged to report truthfully), and finally individual rationality (the payments to the home agents must outweigh their incurred costs). In this thesis, mechanism design is used to develop and analyse two mechanisms. The first, named the uniform mechanism, divides the savings made by the aggregator equally among the houses. This is both Nash incentive compatible, strongly budget balanced and individually rational. However, the agents' rewards are not fair insofar as each agent is rewarded equally irrespective of that agent's actual contribution to the savings. This results in a smaller incentive for agents to produce precise reports. Moreover, it encourages undesirable behaviour from agents who are able to make the loads placed upon the grid more volatile such that they are harder to predict. To resolve these issues, a novel scoring rule-based mechanism named sum of others' plus max is developed, which uses the spherical scoring rule to more fairly distribute rewards to agents based on the accuracy and precision of their individual reports. This mechanism is weakly budget balanced, dominant strategy incentive compatible and individually rational. Moreover, it encourages agents to make their loads less volatile, such that they are more predictable. This has obvious advantages to the electricity grid. For example, the amount of spinning reserve generation can be reduced, reducing the carbon output of the grid and the cost per unit of electricity. This work makes use of both theoretical and empirical analysis in order to evaluate the aforementioned mechanisms. Theoretical analysis is used in order to prove budget balance, individual rationality and incentive compatibility. However, theoretical evaluation of the equilibrium strategies within each of the mechanisms quickly becomes intractable. Consequently, empirical evaluation is used to further analyse the properties of the mechanisms. This analysis is first performed in an environment in which agents are able to manipulate their reports. However, further analysis is provided which shows the behaviour of the agents when they are able to make themselves harder to predict. Such a scenario has thus far not been discussed within mechanism design literature. Empirical analysis shows the sum of others' plus max mechanism to provide greater incentives for agents to make precise predictions. Furthermore, as a result of this, the aggregator increases its utility through implementing the sum of others' plus max mechanism over the uniform mechanism and over implementing no mechanism. Moreover, in settings which allow agents to manipulate the volatility of their loads, it is shown that the uniform mechanism causes the aggregator to lose utility in comparison to using no mechanism, whereas in comparison to no mechanism, the sum of others' plus max mechanism causes an increase in utility to the aggregator