Incorporating Symbolic Sequential Modeling for Speech Enhancement

In a noisy environment, a lossy speech signal can be automatically restored by a listener if he/she knows the language well. That is, with the built-in knowledge of a "language model", a listener may effectively suppress noise interference and retrieve the target speech signals. Accordingly, we argue that familiarity with the underlying linguistic content of spoken utterances benefits speech enhancement (SE) in noisy environments. In this study, in addition to the conventional modeling for learning the acoustic noisy-clean speech mapping, an abstract symbolic sequential modeling is incorporated into the SE framework. This symbolic sequential modeling can be regarded as a "linguistic constraint" in learning the acoustic noisy-clean speech mapping function. In this study, the symbolic sequences for acoustic signals are obtained as discrete representations with a Vector Quantized Variational Autoencoder algorithm. The obtained symbols are able to capture high-level phoneme-like content from speech signals. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed framework can obtain notable performance improvement in terms of perceptual evaluation of speech quality (PESQ) and short-time objective intelligibility (STOI) on the TIMIT dataset.Comment: Accepted to Interspeech 201

Speech Enhancement using a Deep Mixture of Experts

In this study we present a Deep Mixture of Experts (DMoE) neural-network architecture for single microphone speech enhancement. By contrast to most speech enhancement algorithms that overlook the speech variability mainly caused by phoneme structure, our framework comprises a set of deep neural networks (DNNs), each one of which is an 'expert' in enhancing a given speech type corresponding to a phoneme. A gating DNN determines which expert is assigned to a given speech segment. A speech presence probability (SPP) is then obtained as a weighted average of the expert SPP decisions, with the weights determined by the gating DNN. A soft spectral attenuation, based on the SPP, is then applied to enhance the noisy speech signal. The experts and the gating components of the DMoE network are trained jointly. As part of the training, speech clustering into different subsets is performed in an unsupervised manner. Therefore, unlike previous methods, a phoneme-labeled database is not required for the training procedure. A series of experiments with different noise types verified the applicability of the new algorithm to the task of speech enhancement. The proposed scheme outperforms other schemes that either do not consider phoneme structure or use a simpler training methodology

Supervised Speech Separation Based on Deep Learning: An Overview

Speech separation is the task of separating target speech from background interference. Traditionally, speech separation is studied as a signal processing problem. A more recent approach formulates speech separation as a supervised learning problem, where the discriminative patterns of speech, speakers, and background noise are learned from training data. Over the past decade, many supervised separation algorithms have been put forward. In particular, the recent introduction of deep learning to supervised speech separation has dramatically accelerated progress and boosted separation performance. This article provides a comprehensive overview of the research on deep learning based supervised speech separation in the last several years. We first introduce the background of speech separation and the formulation of supervised separation. Then we discuss three main components of supervised separation: learning machines, training targets, and acoustic features. Much of the overview is on separation algorithms where we review monaural methods, including speech enhancement (speech-nonspeech separation), speaker separation (multi-talker separation), and speech dereverberation, as well as multi-microphone techniques. The important issue of generalization, unique to supervised learning, is discussed. This overview provides a historical perspective on how advances are made. In addition, we discuss a number of conceptual issues, including what constitutes the target source.Comment: 27 pages, 17 figure