A Tight Lower Bound on the Sub-Packetization Level of Optimal-Access MSR and MDS Codes

The first focus of the present paper, is on lower bounds on the sub-packetization level $\alpha$ of an MSR code that is capable of carrying out repair in help-by-transfer fashion (also called optimal-access property). We prove here a lower bound on $\alpha$ which is shown to be tight for the case $d=(n-1)$ by comparing with recent code constructions in the literature. We also extend our results to an $[n,k]$ MDS code over the vector alphabet. Our objective even here, is on lower bounds on the sub-packetization level $\alpha$ of an MDS code that can carry out repair of any node in a subset of $w$ nodes, $1 \leq w \leq (n-1)$ where each node is repaired (linear repair) by help-by-transfer with minimum repair bandwidth. We prove a lower bound on $\alpha$ for the case of $d=(n-1)$. This bound holds for any $w (\leq n-1)$ and is shown to be tight, again by comparing with recent code constructions in the literature. Also provided, are bounds for the case $d<(n-1)$. We study the form of a vector MDS code having the property that we can repair failed nodes belonging to a fixed set of $Q$ nodes with minimum repair bandwidth and in optimal-access fashion, and which achieve our lower bound on sub-packetization level $\alpha$. It turns out interestingly, that such a code must necessarily have a coupled-layer structure, similar to that of the Ye-Barg code.Comment: Revised for ISIT 2018 submissio

An Alternate Construction of an Access-Optimal Regenerating Code with Optimal Sub-Packetization Level

Given the scale of today's distributed storage systems, the failure of an individual node is a common phenomenon. Various metrics have been proposed to measure the efficacy of the repair of a failed node, such as the amount of data download needed to repair (also known as the repair bandwidth), the amount of data accessed at the helper nodes, and the number of helper nodes contacted. Clearly, the amount of data accessed can never be smaller than the repair bandwidth. In the case of a help-by-transfer code, the amount of data accessed is equal to the repair bandwidth. It follows that a help-by-transfer code possessing optimal repair bandwidth is access optimal. The focus of the present paper is on help-by-transfer codes that employ minimum possible bandwidth to repair the systematic nodes and are thus access optimal for the repair of a systematic node. The zigzag construction by Tamo et al. in which both systematic and parity nodes are repaired is access optimal. But the sub-packetization level required is $r^k$ where $r$ is the number of parities and $k$ is the number of systematic nodes. To date, the best known achievable sub-packetization level for access-optimal codes is $r^{k/r}$ in a MISER-code-based construction by Cadambe et al. in which only the systematic nodes are repaired and where the location of symbols transmitted by a helper node depends only on the failed node and is the same for all helper nodes. Under this set-up, it turns out that this sub-packetization level cannot be improved upon. In the present paper, we present an alternate construction under the same setup, of an access-optimal code repairing systematic nodes, that is inspired by the zigzag code construction and that also achieves a sub-packetization level of $r^{k/r}$.Comment: To appear in National Conference on Communications 201