1,595 research outputs found

    A practical index for approximate dictionary matching with few mismatches

    Get PDF
    Approximate dictionary matching is a classic string matching problem (checking if a query string occurs in a collection of strings) with applications in, e.g., spellchecking, online catalogs, geolocation, and web searchers. We present a surprisingly simple solution called a split index, which is based on the Dirichlet principle, for matching a keyword with few mismatches, and experimentally show that it offers competitive space-time tradeoffs. Our implementation in the C++ language is focused mostly on data compaction, which is beneficial for the search speed (e.g., by being cache friendly). We compare our solution with other algorithms and we show that it performs better for the Hamming distance. Query times in the order of 1 microsecond were reported for one mismatch for the dictionary size of a few megabytes on a medium-end PC. We also demonstrate that a basic compression technique consisting in qq-gram substitution can significantly reduce the index size (up to 50% of the input text size for the DNA), while still keeping the query time relatively low

    Dictionary Matching with One Gap

    Full text link
    The dictionary matching with gaps problem is to preprocess a dictionary DD of dd gapped patterns P1,,PdP_1,\ldots,P_d over alphabet Σ\Sigma, where each gapped pattern PiP_i is a sequence of subpatterns separated by bounded sequences of don't cares. Then, given a query text TT of length nn over alphabet Σ\Sigma, the goal is to output all locations in TT in which a pattern PiDP_i\in D, 1id1\leq i\leq d, ends. There is a renewed current interest in the gapped matching problem stemming from cyber security. In this paper we solve the problem where all patterns in the dictionary have one gap with at least α\alpha and at most β\beta don't cares, where α\alpha and β\beta are given parameters. Specifically, we show that the dictionary matching with a single gap problem can be solved in either O(dlogd+D)O(d\log d + |D|) time and O(dlogεd+D)O(d\log^{\varepsilon} d + |D|) space, and query time O(n(βα)loglogdlog2min{d,logD}+occ)O(n(\beta -\alpha )\log\log d \log ^2 \min \{ d, \log |D| \} + occ), where occocc is the number of patterns found, or preprocessing time and space: O(d2+D)O(d^2 + |D|), and query time O(n(βα)+occ)O(n(\beta -\alpha ) + occ), where occocc is the number of patterns found. As far as we know, this is the best solution for this setting of the problem, where many overlaps may exist in the dictionary.Comment: A preliminary version was published at CPM 201

    Composite Correlation Quantization for Efficient Multimodal Retrieval

    Full text link
    Efficient similarity retrieval from large-scale multimodal database is pervasive in modern search engines and social networks. To support queries across content modalities, the system should enable cross-modal correlation and computation-efficient indexing. While hashing methods have shown great potential in achieving this goal, current attempts generally fail to learn isomorphic hash codes in a seamless scheme, that is, they embed multiple modalities in a continuous isomorphic space and separately threshold embeddings into binary codes, which incurs substantial loss of retrieval accuracy. In this paper, we approach seamless multimodal hashing by proposing a novel Composite Correlation Quantization (CCQ) model. Specifically, CCQ jointly finds correlation-maximal mappings that transform different modalities into isomorphic latent space, and learns composite quantizers that convert the isomorphic latent features into compact binary codes. An optimization framework is devised to preserve both intra-modal similarity and inter-modal correlation through minimizing both reconstruction and quantization errors, which can be trained from both paired and partially paired data in linear time. A comprehensive set of experiments clearly show the superior effectiveness and efficiency of CCQ against the state of the art hashing methods for both unimodal and cross-modal retrieval

    Lightweight Fingerprints for Fast Approximate Keyword Matching Using Bitwise Operations

    Get PDF
    We aim to speed up approximate keyword matching with the use of a lightweight, fixed-size block of data for each string, called a fingerprint. These work in a similar way to hash values; however, they can be also used for matching with errors. They store information regarding symbol occurrences using individual bits, and they can be compared against each other with a constant number of bitwise operations. In this way, certain strings can be deduced to be at least within the distance k from each other (using Hamming or Levenshtein distance) without performing an explicit verification. We show experimentally that for a preprocessed collection of strings, fingerprints can provide substantial speedups for k = 1, namely over 2.5 times for the Hamming distance and over 30 times for the Levenshtein distance. Tests were conducted on synthetic and real-world English and URL data

    Pattern Matching in Multiple Streams

    Full text link
    We investigate the problem of deterministic pattern matching in multiple streams. In this model, one symbol arrives at a time and is associated with one of s streaming texts. The task at each time step is to report if there is a new match between a fixed pattern of length m and a newly updated stream. As is usual in the streaming context, the goal is to use as little space as possible while still reporting matches quickly. We give almost matching upper and lower space bounds for three distinct pattern matching problems. For exact matching we show that the problem can be solved in constant time per arriving symbol and O(m+s) words of space. For the k-mismatch and k-difference problems we give O(k) time solutions that require O(m+ks) words of space. In all three cases we also give space lower bounds which show our methods are optimal up to a single logarithmic factor. Finally we set out a number of open problems related to this new model for pattern matching.Comment: 13 pages, 1 figur
    corecore