4,398 research outputs found
Context-Aware Generative Adversarial Privacy
Preserving the utility of published datasets while simultaneously providing
provable privacy guarantees is a well-known challenge. On the one hand,
context-free privacy solutions, such as differential privacy, provide strong
privacy guarantees, but often lead to a significant reduction in utility. On
the other hand, context-aware privacy solutions, such as information theoretic
privacy, achieve an improved privacy-utility tradeoff, but assume that the data
holder has access to dataset statistics. We circumvent these limitations by
introducing a novel context-aware privacy framework called generative
adversarial privacy (GAP). GAP leverages recent advancements in generative
adversarial networks (GANs) to allow the data holder to learn privatization
schemes from the dataset itself. Under GAP, learning the privacy mechanism is
formulated as a constrained minimax game between two players: a privatizer that
sanitizes the dataset in a way that limits the risk of inference attacks on the
individuals' private variables, and an adversary that tries to infer the
private variables from the sanitized dataset. To evaluate GAP's performance, we
investigate two simple (yet canonical) statistical dataset models: (a) the
binary data model, and (b) the binary Gaussian mixture model. For both models,
we derive game-theoretically optimal minimax privacy mechanisms, and show that
the privacy mechanisms learned from data (in a generative adversarial fashion)
match the theoretically optimal ones. This demonstrates that our framework can
be easily applied in practice, even in the absence of dataset statistics.Comment: Improved version of a paper accepted by Entropy Journal, Special
Issue on Information Theory in Machine Learning and Data Scienc
A Utility-Theoretic Approach to Privacy in Online Services
Online offerings such as web search, news portals, and e-commerce applications face the challenge of providing high-quality service to a large, heterogeneous user base. Recent efforts have highlighted the potential to improve performance by introducing methods to personalize services based on special knowledge about users and their context. For example, a user's demographics, location, and past search and browsing may be useful in enhancing the results offered in response to web search queries. However, reasonable concerns about privacy by both users, providers, and government agencies acting on behalf of citizens, may limit access by services to such information. We introduce and explore an economics of privacy in personalization, where people can opt to share personal information, in a standing or on-demand manner, in return for expected enhancements in the quality of an online service. We focus on the example of web search and formulate realistic objective functions for search efficacy and privacy. We demonstrate how we can find a provably near-optimal optimization of the utility-privacy tradeoff in an efficient manner. We evaluate our methodology on data drawn from a log of the search activity of volunteer participants. We separately assess usersā preferences about privacy and utility via a large-scale survey, aimed at eliciting preferences about peoplesā willingness to trade the sharing of personal data in returns for gains in search efficiency. We show that a significant level of personalization can be achieved using a relatively small amount of information about users
Privacy Games: Optimal User-Centric Data Obfuscation
In this paper, we design user-centric obfuscation mechanisms that impose the
minimum utility loss for guaranteeing user's privacy. We optimize utility
subject to a joint guarantee of differential privacy (indistinguishability) and
distortion privacy (inference error). This double shield of protection limits
the information leakage through obfuscation mechanism as well as the posterior
inference. We show that the privacy achieved through joint
differential-distortion mechanisms against optimal attacks is as large as the
maximum privacy that can be achieved by either of these mechanisms separately.
Their utility cost is also not larger than what either of the differential or
distortion mechanisms imposes. We model the optimization problem as a
leader-follower game between the designer of obfuscation mechanism and the
potential adversary, and design adaptive mechanisms that anticipate and protect
against optimal inference algorithms. Thus, the obfuscation mechanism is
optimal against any inference algorithm
Differential Privacy versus Quantitative Information Flow
Differential privacy is a notion of privacy that has become very popular in
the database community. Roughly, the idea is that a randomized query mechanism
provides sufficient privacy protection if the ratio between the probabilities
of two different entries to originate a certain answer is bound by e^\epsilon.
In the fields of anonymity and information flow there is a similar concern for
controlling information leakage, i.e. limiting the possibility of inferring the
secret information from the observables. In recent years, researchers have
proposed to quantify the leakage in terms of the information-theoretic notion
of mutual information. There are two main approaches that fall in this
category: One based on Shannon entropy, and one based on R\'enyi's min entropy.
The latter has connection with the so-called Bayes risk, which expresses the
probability of guessing the secret. In this paper, we show how to model the
query system in terms of an information-theoretic channel, and we compare the
notion of differential privacy with that of mutual information. We show that
the notion of differential privacy is strictly stronger, in the sense that it
implies a bound on the mutual information, but not viceversa
Quantifying Privacy: A Novel Entropy-Based Measure of Disclosure Risk
It is well recognised that data mining and statistical analysis pose a
serious treat to privacy. This is true for financial, medical, criminal and
marketing research. Numerous techniques have been proposed to protect privacy,
including restriction and data modification. Recently proposed privacy models
such as differential privacy and k-anonymity received a lot of attention and
for the latter there are now several improvements of the original scheme, each
removing some security shortcomings of the previous one. However, the challenge
lies in evaluating and comparing privacy provided by various techniques. In
this paper we propose a novel entropy based security measure that can be
applied to any generalisation, restriction or data modification technique. We
use our measure to empirically evaluate and compare a few popular methods,
namely query restriction, sampling and noise addition.Comment: 20 pages, 4 figure
- ā¦