3,351 research outputs found
What is the functional role of adult neurogenesis in the hippocampus?
The dentate gyrus is part of the hippocampal memory system and special in
that it generates new neurons throughout life. Here we discuss the
question of what the functional role of these new neurons might be. Our
hypothesis is that they help the dentate gyrus to avoid the problem of
catastrophic interference when adapting to new environments. We assume
that old neurons are rather stable and preserve an optimal encoding
learned for known environments while new neurons are plastic to adapt to
those features that are qualitatively new in a new environment. A simple
network simulation demonstrates that adding new plastic neurons is indeed
a successful strategy for adaptation without catastrophic interference
Il-15/il-15rΞ± signalling and synaptic transmission: a crosstalk between the immune and the nervous system?
Immune and nervous system have been traditionally considered separately, but from β90s many studies had unraveled the deep interconnection and interdependence between these two systems, enough to coin the term βneuroimmune systemβ to define this relationship.
While it was well known that central nervous system (CNS) actively communicates with the immune system to control immune responses both centrally and peripherally, the opposite action was just recently discovered.
Related to the role of immune system in defending and react, the interactions between immune system and CNS have been classically studied in contexts of neuroinflammation such as trauma, injury and disease [1] [2].
Recent evidences about the neuroinflammatory process in non-pathological conditions and the discovery of the important involvement of adaptive immune system in healthy brain development and activity [3], have opened many questions about physiological neuroimmune cross-talk.
In this view, the cytokine network, well known to operate in a bidirectional way affecting both immune and nervous system, has a pivotal role in neuroimmune cross-talk [4]. Traditionally seen as immunomodulators, in the last years has been evident that cytokines are also potent neuromodulators [5].
In the complex cytokine system, interleukin 15 (IL-15) is considered a bridge between adaptive and innate immune system and it is one of the first upregulated cytokines in neuroinflammation [6]. It has many bioregulatory roles which range from those of modulator of selected adaptive immune responses [7] [8] and central player in the development and homeostasis of several immunocyte populations [9] to those of a potent, general inhibitor of apoptosis in multiple systems [9].
Interestingly, has been shown that IL-15 and IL-15RΞ± deletions affect memory and neurotransmitters concentration suggesting a major role of this signalling in cerebral functions which cannot be compensated during the development [10] [11] [12]. IL-15RΞ± KO mice, in particular, show decreased retention of spatial memory and contextual fear, both related to hippocampus-dependent memory, and alteration in GABA concentration. Their hippocampal ultrastructure is, however, well preserved, suggesting that the modulatory changes may involve neural plasticity even if the exact role of IL15 in modulating neurotransmission has not been investigated so far.
The understandings about the mechanism by which IL-15/IL-15RΞ± system affect the synaptic transmission may be useful to get insight into the mechanisms of cross talk between the immune and the nervous system and eventually to develop strategies to treat pathologies whose symptoms are memory impairments and neuroinflammation
ν΄λ§ νμ μμ CA1κ³Ό CA3μ μκ° μκ·Ή λ³νμ λ°λ₯Έ μ₯μ νμ ν¨ν΄ μ°κ΅¬
νμλ
Όλ¬Έ(λ°μ¬) -- μμΈλνκ΅λνμ : μμ°κ³Όνλν λμΈμ§κ³Όνκ³Ό, 2023. 2. μ΄μΈμ.μ°λ¦¬κ° μΌμμμ κ²½ννλ μ¬κ±΄λ€μ νλμ μ€ν λ¦¬λ‘ κ΅¬μ±λμ΄ μΌν κΈ°μ΅μΌλ‘ νμ±λλ€. ν΄λ§λ κ³Όκ±°μ κ²½νν μΌ λ€ λΏλ§ μλλΌ νμ¬ κ²½ννκ³ μλ μ¬κ±΄λ€μ λν μΌν κΈ°μ΅μ μ²λ¦¬ν λ νμμ μΈ λ μμμ΄λΌκ³ μλ €μ Έ μλ€. μ€μΉλ₯μ ν΄λ§μμ κ΄μ°°λλ μ₯μ μΈν¬λ ν΄λ§κ° λλ¬Όμ΄ μΈμ§νκ³ μλ 곡κ°μ λν μ§λλ₯Ό νμ±νλ ν΅μ¬μ μΈ μν μ νλ κ²μΌλ‘ μλ €μ Έ μλ€. νΉν νΉμ ν 곡κ°μμλ§ μ λ³μ μΌλ‘ λ°ννλ μ₯μ μΈν¬λ νκ²½μ λ³νκ° μ£Όμ΄μ‘μ λ remappingμ΄λΌλ νμμΌλ‘ νκ²½μ λ³νλ₯Ό λ°μνλ€κ³ μλ €μ Έ μλ€. νκ²½μ λ³νκ° μμ λ, μ₯μ μΈν¬κ° λμΌν μμΉμμ νλνλ©° λ°ν λΉλλ₯Ό μ‘°μ νκ±°λ μ ν λ€λ₯Έ μ₯μμμ νλνλ ν¨ν΄μΌλ‘ κ΄μ°°λλ€. μ΄λ¬ν μ₯μ μΈν¬μ λ³νλ i) κΈ°μ‘΄μ κΈ°μ΅μ μ‘°κΈ λ³ννκ±°λ, ii) μλ‘μ΄ κΈ°μ΅μ νμ±νλ μΌν κΈ°μ΅μ ννλ₯Ό κ°μ§κ³ μλ€. νμ§λ§ μ₯μ μΈν¬κ° λΆκ·μΉμ μΈ ν¨ν΄μΌλ‘ 곡κ°μ λ³νλ₯Ό νμν¨μ λ°λΌ μ΄λ€μ νλμ΄ κ°λ μλ―Έλ λΆλΆλͺ
νκ² λ¨μμλ€. λν μ₯μ μΈν¬κ° 볡ν©μ μΈ κ°κ° μ 보λ€μ λ°μνλ€λ νΉμ§μ, μ΄λ€μ΄ μ΄λ€ μΈμ§μ μλ―Έλ₯Ό κ°μ§λ©° νλμ νλ κ²μΈμ§μ λν λμ λ₯Ό λ¨κ²Όλ€. λ³ΈμΈμ ν΄λ§μ μ₯μ μΈν¬κ° μΌν κΈ°μ΅μ μ΄λ€ κΈ°μ¬λ₯Ό ν κ²μΈμ§, νΉν λ³νλ νκ²½μμ 무μμ μλ‘ κΈ°μ΅νκ³ κΈ°μ‘΄μ μκ³ μλ μ 보λ μ΄λ»κ² μ²λ¦¬ν κ²μΈμ§ μ°μ°νλ κ³Όμ μ ν΄λ§μ νμ μμμΈ CA1κ³Ό CA3μμ κ°κ° μ΄λ»κ² νμνλμ§ μμλ³΄κ³ μ νμλ€. μ΄μ λν λ΅μ μ°ΎκΈ° μν΄ λ³ΈμΈμ λλ¬Όμ΄ μνΈμμ©νλ©° κ²½νν μ μλ κ°μ νμ€ (VR) μμ€ν
μ μ μνμ¬ κ°μ νκ²½μ μκ° μκ·Ήμ μ λμ μΌλ‘ μ‘°μνμλ€. μ΄ κ³Όμ μμ λ³ΈμΈμ λλ¬Όμ΄ κ²½ννλ μκ° μκ·Ήμ λ³νμ (i.e., input) ν΄λ§ μ₯μμΈν¬μ μ κΈ°μ νλ (i.e., output) κ°μ κ΄κ³λ₯Ό μ‘°μ¬νμλ€. 첫 λ²μ§Έ μ§λ¬ΈμΌλ‘λ λ³ΈμΈμ΄ ꡬμΆν κ°μ νμ€ μμ€ν
μμ μ₯μ μΈν¬κ° λ°νλλμ§λ₯Ό νμΈνμλ€. κ·Έ κ²°κ³Όλ‘ κΈ°μ‘΄ λ¬Ένμμ λ³΄κ³ λμλ κ²°κ³Όμ λΉμ·ν μμ€μ μ₯μ μΈν¬λ€μ κ²μ¦ν μ μμλ€. λ³ΈμΈμ΄ ꡬμΆν κ°μ νμ€ μμ€ν
μμ μ₯μ μΈν¬κ° κ΄μ°°λλ€λ κ²μ νμΈν μ΄νμλ, κΈ°μ‘΄ νκ²½μ μ λμ μΈ μκ°μ λ³νλ₯Ό μ£Όμ΄ μ₯μ μΈν¬κ° ν΄λΉ λ³νλ₯Ό μ΄λ»κ² λ°μνλμ§ μ§λ¬Ένμλ€. κ·Έ κ²°κ³Όλ‘, ν΄λ§μ νμ μμ CA1μμ κΈ°μ‘΄ νκ²½μ λν νμμ μ μ§νλ μ§λ¨κ³Ό, νΉμ νκ²½μ λ³νκ° κ°ν΄μ§ μ¬κ±΄μ μν΄ μλ‘μ΄ νμμ μ μ§νλ μ§λ¨μ΄ λμλ€λ°μ μΌλ‘ λλλ€λ νμμ κ΄μ°°νμλ€. λ°λ©΄, ν΄λ§ νμ μμμΈ CA3μμλ νκ²½μ λ³νκ° μ΄λ£¨μ΄μ‘μμλ λΆκ΅¬νκ³ λλΆλΆμ μ₯μ μΈν¬λ€μ΄ κΈ°μ‘΄ νκ²½μ λν νμμ μ μ§νμλ€. μ΄λ¬ν κ²°κ³Όλ₯Ό ν λλ‘ ν΄λ§ νμ μμμΈ CA3μ κΈ°μ‘΄μ μκ³ μλ νκ²½μ λν κΈ°μ΅μ μμ μ μΌλ‘ μ μ§νλ μν μ μννλ λ°λ©΄, ν΄λ§ νμ μμμΈ CA1μ λ³ννλ νκ²½ λ΄μμλ μ΄μ μ κΈ°μ΅κ³Ό μλ‘μ΄ κΈ°μ΅μ λ
립μ μΌλ‘ ꡬλΆνμ¬ μλ‘μ΄ μ 보λ₯Ό μ μ°νκ² νμ΅νλλ‘ νλ κ°λ₯μ±μ μ μνκ³ μ νλ€.Any events or experiences in the given space and time are stitched together as an episode. The hippocampus has been widely acknowledged for its role in episodic memory for decades. At the same time, the rodent hippocampus exhibits the salient feature where its principal neurons are active in a spatially selective pattern (i.e., place cell). The place cells change their firing patterns as there are changes in the environments. Until now, we have been interpreting these firing changes, also known as "remapping," to have a functional significance in episodic memory by i) slightly modifying the old map to retrieve subtle changes from the previous memory or ii) forming the new map to reflect any major changes. In the real world, place cells receive complex sensory information from multiple sources, including multimodal sensory inputs and idiothetic information, making it even more challenging to interpret place cell activity from the intermingled sensory inputs fed into the hippocampal system. Taking advantage of the virtual reality (VR) system, I investigated how the hippocampal subregions CA1 and CA3 networks reflect environmental change. Thereby, I parametrically manipulated the environment by adding visual noise (i.e., virtual fog) in the VR environment and examined how hippocampal place cells in the CA1 and CA3 responded as visual noises were added to the environment in a quantified manner. Prior studies have suggested that CA3 forms a discrete map of the modified environments, presumably by performing either pattern separation or pattern completion. However, place cells in CA1 exhibit less coherent responses to environmental changes compared to CA3. This discrepancy between the CA1 and CA3 subregions is puzzling because CA3 output must pass through the CA1 area before reaching cortical areas. Furthermore, the functional roles of the CA1 in processing the environmental changes still need to be investigated due to the heterogeneous neural outputs with mixed yet conflicting findings. I first questioned whether our VR system reliably induced the place cells from both hippocampal subregions CA1 and CA3. As a result, I observed that the firing properties of hippocampal place cells are equivalent to that reported in the previous studies. Once I confirmed that visual environments in our VR system dominantly controlled the place cells, I examined how place cells in the CA1 and CA3 subregions responded to various levels of changes made to the visual environment. As visual noise was introduced to the familiar environment, I found that place cells in CA1 split simultaneously into two subpopulations: In one, place cells with old maps while changing their firing rate to reflect noise levels (i.e., rate remapping); in another, place cells with new maps to differentiate the dynamically changing environment from an old stable environment (i.e., global remapping). The place cells in CA3 mainly sustained the old map and reflected noise levels by rate remapping. Suppose one considers the rate remapping class of place cells as pattern-completing cells and the global remapping class as pattern-separating cells. In that case, the CA1 can manifest both pattern separation and pattern completion classes of neurons at the environmental change. My dissertation suggests that CA1 can simultaneously form an orthogonal map of the same environment to remember new episodes without interfering with the old memory.Background 1
Anatomical structures of the Hippocampal system and their proposed roles 2
The remapping properties of Hippocampal place cell 7
The usage of the virtual reality (VR) system for rodents in studying the hippocampus 16
Chapter 1. Visual scene stimulus exerts dominant control over the place fields 19
Introduction 20
Materials and methods 22
Results 37
Discussion 53
Chapter 2. The functional role of the CA1 and CA3 in processing the visually modified environment 56
Introduction 57
Materials and methods 59
Results 63
Discussion 94
General Discussion 98
Bibliography 111
κ΅λ¬Έμ΄λ‘ 137λ°
The hippocampus and cerebellum in adaptively timed learning, recognition, and movement
The concepts of declarative memory and procedural memory have been used to distinguish two basic types of learning. A neural network model suggests how such memory processes work together as recognition learning, reinforcement learning, and sensory-motor learning take place during adaptive behaviors. To coordinate these processes, the hippocampal formation and cerebellum each contain circuits that learn to adaptively time their outputs. Within the model, hippocampal timing helps to maintain attention on motivationally salient goal objects during variable task-related delays, and cerebellar timing controls the release of conditioned responses. This property is part of the model's description of how cognitive-emotional interactions focus attention on motivationally valued cues, and how this process breaks down due to hippocampal ablation. The model suggests that the hippocampal mechanisms that help to rapidly draw attention to salient cues could prematurely release motor commands were not the release of these commands adaptively timed by the cerebellum. The model hippocampal system modulates cortical recognition learning without actually encoding the representational information that the cortex encodes. These properties avoid the difficulties faced by several models that propose a direct hippocampal role in recognition learning. Learning within the model hippocampal system controls adaptive timing and spatial orientation. Model properties hereby clarify how hippocampal ablations cause amnesic symptoms and difficulties with tasks which combine task delays, novelty detection, and attention towards goal objects amid distractions. When these model recognition, reinforcement, sensory-motor, and timing processes work together, they suggest how the brain can accomplish conditioning of multiple sensory events to delayed rewards, as during serial compound conditioning.Air Force Office of Scientific Research (F49620-92-J-0225, F49620-86-C-0037, 90-0128); Advanced Research Projects Agency (ONR N00014-92-J-4015); Office of Naval Research (N00014-91-J-4100, N00014-92-J-1309, N00014-92-J-1904); National Institute of Mental Health (MH-42900
Neural Dynamics of Autistic Behaviors: Cognitive, Emotional, and Timing Substrates
What brain mechanisms underlie autism and how do they give rise to autistic behavioral symptoms? This article describes a neural model, called the iSTART model, which proposes how cognitive, emotional, timing, and motor processes may interact together to create and perpetuate autistic symptoms. These model processes were originally developed to explain data concerning how the brain controls normal behaviors. The iSTART model shows how autistic behavioral symptoms may arise from prescribed breakdowns in these brain processes.Air Force Office of Scientific Research (F49620-01-1-0397); Office of Naval Research (N00014-01-1-0624
How informative are spatial CA3 representations established by the dentate gyrus?
In the mammalian hippocampus, the dentate gyrus (DG) is characterized by
sparse and powerful unidirectional projections to CA3 pyramidal cells, the
so-called mossy fibers. Mossy fiber synapses appear to duplicate, in terms of
the information they convey, what CA3 cells already receive from entorhinal
cortex layer II cells, which project both to the dentate gyrus and to CA3.
Computational models of episodic memory have hypothesized that the function of
the mossy fibers is to enforce a new, well separated pattern of activity onto
CA3 cells, to represent a new memory, prevailing over the interference produced
by the traces of older memories already stored on CA3 recurrent collateral
connections. Can this hypothesis apply also to spatial representations, as
described by recent neurophysiological recordings in rats? To address this
issue quantitatively, we estimate the amount of information DG can impart on a
new CA3 pattern of spatial activity, using both mathematical analysis and
computer simulations of a simplified model. We confirm that, also in the
spatial case, the observed sparse connectivity and level of activity are most
appropriate for driving memory storage and not to initiate retrieval.
Surprisingly, the model also indicates that even when DG codes just for space,
much of the information it passes on to CA3 acquires a non-spatial and episodic
character, akin to that of a random number generator. It is suggested that
further hippocampal processing is required to make full spatial use of DG
inputs.Comment: 19 pages, 11 figures, 1 table, submitte
- β¦