2 research outputs found
Universal First-Order Logic is Superfluous for NL, P, NP and coNP
In this work we continue the syntactic study of completeness that began with
the works of Immerman and Medina. In particular, we take a conjecture raised by
Medina in his dissertation that says if a conjunction of a second-order and a
first-order sentences defines an NP-complete problems via fops, then it must be
the case that the second-order conjoint alone also defines a NP-complete
problem. Although this claim looks very plausible and intuitive, currently we
cannot provide a definite answer for it. However, we can solve in the
affirmative a weaker claim that says that all ``consistent'' universal
first-order sentences can be safely eliminated without the fear of losing
completeness. Our methods are quite general and can be applied to complexity
classes other than NP (in this paper: to NLSPACE, PTIME, and coNP), provided
the class has a complete problem satisfying a certain combinatorial property