3,745 research outputs found
From Social Data Mining to Forecasting Socio-Economic Crisis
Socio-economic data mining has a great potential in terms of gaining a better
understanding of problems that our economy and society are facing, such as
financial instability, shortages of resources, or conflicts. Without
large-scale data mining, progress in these areas seems hard or impossible.
Therefore, a suitable, distributed data mining infrastructure and research
centers should be built in Europe. It also appears appropriate to build a
network of Crisis Observatories. They can be imagined as laboratories devoted
to the gathering and processing of enormous volumes of data on both natural
systems such as the Earth and its ecosystem, as well as on human
techno-socio-economic systems, so as to gain early warnings of impending
events. Reality mining provides the chance to adapt more quickly and more
accurately to changing situations. Further opportunities arise by individually
customized services, which however should be provided in a privacy-respecting
way. This requires the development of novel ICT (such as a self- organizing
Web), but most likely new legal regulations and suitable institutions as well.
As long as such regulations are lacking on a world-wide scale, it is in the
public interest that scientists explore what can be done with the huge data
available. Big data do have the potential to change or even threaten democratic
societies. The same applies to sudden and large-scale failures of ICT systems.
Therefore, dealing with data must be done with a large degree of responsibility
and care. Self-interests of individuals, companies or institutions have limits,
where the public interest is affected, and public interest is not a sufficient
justification to violate human rights of individuals. Privacy is a high good,
as confidentiality is, and damaging it would have serious side effects for
society.Comment: 65 pages, 1 figure, Visioneer White Paper, see
http://www.visioneer.ethz.c
IoT trust and reputation: a survey and taxonomy
IoT is one of the fastest-growing technologies and it is estimated that more
than a billion devices would be utilized across the globe by the end of 2030.
To maximize the capability of these connected entities, trust and reputation
among IoT entities is essential. Several trust management models have been
proposed in the IoT environment; however, these schemes have not fully
addressed the IoT devices features, such as devices role, device type and its
dynamic behavior in a smart environment. As a result, traditional trust and
reputation models are insufficient to tackle these characteristics and
uncertainty risks while connecting nodes to the network. Whilst continuous
study has been carried out and various articles suggest promising solutions in
constrained environments, research on trust and reputation is still at its
infancy. In this paper, we carry out a comprehensive literature review on
state-of-the-art research on the trust and reputation of IoT devices and
systems. Specifically, we first propose a new structure, namely a new taxonomy,
to organize the trust and reputation models based on the ways trust is managed.
The proposed taxonomy comprises of traditional trust management-based systems
and artificial intelligence-based systems, and combine both the classes which
encourage the existing schemes to adapt these emerging concepts. This
collaboration between the conventional mathematical and the advanced ML models
result in design schemes that are more robust and efficient. Then we drill down
to compare and analyse the methods and applications of these systems based on
community-accepted performance metrics, e.g. scalability, delay,
cooperativeness and efficiency. Finally, built upon the findings of the
analysis, we identify and discuss open research issues and challenges, and
further speculate and point out future research directions.Comment: 20 pages, 5 Figures, 3 tables, Journal of cloud computin
- …