446 research outputs found

    List Distinguishing Parameters of Trees

    Full text link
    A coloring of the vertices of a graph G is said to be distinguishing} provided no nontrivial automorphism of G preserves all of the vertex colors. The distinguishing number of G, D(G), is the minimum number of colors in a distinguishing coloring of G. The distinguishing chromatic number of G, chi_D(G), is the minimum number of colors in a distinguishing coloring of G that is also a proper coloring. Recently the notion of a distinguishing coloring was extended to that of a list distinguishing coloring. Given an assignment L= {L(v) : v in V(G)} of lists of available colors to the vertices of G, we say that G is (properly) L-distinguishable if there is a (proper) distinguishing coloring f of G such that f(v) is in L(v) for all v. The list distinguishing number of G, D_l(G), is the minimum integer k such that G is L-distinguishable for any list assignment L with |L(v)| = k for all v. Similarly, the list distinguishing chromatic number of G, denoted chi_{D_l}(G) is the minimum integer k such that G is properly L-distinguishable for any list assignment L with |L(v)| = k for all v. In this paper, we study these distinguishing parameters for trees, and in particular extend an enumerative technique of Cheng to show that for any tree T, D_l(T) = D(T), chi_D(T)=chi_{D_l}(T), and chi_D(T) <= D(T) + 1.Comment: 10 page

    Group twin coloring of graphs

    Full text link
    For a given graph GG, the least integer k2k\geq 2 such that for every Abelian group G\mathcal{G} of order kk there exists a proper edge labeling f:E(G)Gf:E(G)\rightarrow \mathcal{G} so that xN(u)f(xu)xN(v)f(xv)\sum_{x\in N(u)}f(xu)\neq \sum_{x\in N(v)}f(xv) for each edge uvE(G)uv\in E(G) is called the \textit{group twin chromatic index} of GG and denoted by χg(G)\chi'_g(G). This graph invariant is related to a few well-known problems in the field of neighbor distinguishing graph colorings. We conjecture that χg(G)Δ(G)+3\chi'_g(G)\leq \Delta(G)+3 for all graphs without isolated edges, where Δ(G)\Delta(G) is the maximum degree of GG, and provide an infinite family of connected graph (trees) for which the equality holds. We prove that this conjecture is valid for all trees, and then apply this result as the base case for proving a general upper bound for all graphs GG without isolated edges: χg(G)2(Δ(G)+col(G))5\chi'_g(G)\leq 2(\Delta(G)+{\rm col}(G))-5, where col(G){\rm col}(G) denotes the coloring number of GG. This improves the best known upper bound known previously only for the case of cyclic groups Zk\mathbb{Z}_k

    Color-blind index in graphs of very low degree

    Get PDF
    Let c:E(G)[k]c:E(G)\to [k] be an edge-coloring of a graph GG, not necessarily proper. For each vertex vv, let cˉ(v)=(a1,,ak)\bar{c}(v)=(a_1,\ldots,a_k), where aia_i is the number of edges incident to vv with color ii. Reorder cˉ(v)\bar{c}(v) for every vv in GG in nonincreasing order to obtain c(v)c^*(v), the color-blind partition of vv. When cc^* induces a proper vertex coloring, that is, c(u)c(v)c^*(u)\neq c^*(v) for every edge uvuv in GG, we say that cc is color-blind distinguishing. The minimum kk for which there exists a color-blind distinguishing edge coloring c:E(G)[k]c:E(G)\to [k] is the color-blind index of GG, denoted dal(G)\operatorname{dal}(G). We demonstrate that determining the color-blind index is more subtle than previously thought. In particular, determining if dal(G)2\operatorname{dal}(G) \leq 2 is NP-complete. We also connect the color-blind index of a regular bipartite graph to 2-colorable regular hypergraphs and characterize when dal(G)\operatorname{dal}(G) is finite for a class of 3-regular graphs.Comment: 10 pages, 3 figures, and a 4 page appendi
    corecore