Schedulability analysis of timed CSP models using the PAT model checker

Timed CSP can be used to model and analyse real-time and concurrent behaviour of embedded control systems. Practical CSP implementations combine the CSP model of a real-time control system with prioritized scheduling to achieve efficient and orderly use of limited resources. Schedulability analysis of a timed CSP model of a system with respect to a scheduling scheme and a particular execution platform is important to ensure that the system design satisfies its timing requirements. In this paper, we propose a framework to analyse schedulability of CSP-based designs for non-preemptive fixed-priority multiprocessor scheduling. The framework is based on the PAT model checker and the analysis is done with dense-time model checking on timed CSP models. We also provide a schedulability analysis workflow to construct and analyse, using the proposed framework, a timed CSP model with scheduling from an initial untimed CSP model without scheduling. We demonstrate our schedulability analysis workflow on a case study of control software design for a mobile robot. The proposed approach provides non-pessimistic schedulability results

Validate implementation correctness using simulation: the TASTE approach

High-integrity systems operate in hostile environment and must guarantee a continuous operational state, even if unexpected events happen. In addition, these systems have stringent requirements that must be validated and correctly translated from high-level specifications down to code. All these constraints make the overall development process more time-consuming. This becomes especially complex because the number of system functions keeps increasing over the years. As a result, engineers must validate system implementation and check that its execution conforms to the specifications. To do so, a traditional approach consists in a manual instrumentation of the implementation code to trace system activity while operating. However, this might be error-prone because modifications are not automatic and still made manually. Furthermore, such modifications may have an impact on the actual behavior of the system. In this paper, we present an approach to validate a system implementation by comparing execution against simulation. In that purpose, we adapt TASTE, a set of tools that eases system development by automating each step as much as possible. In particular, TASTE automates system implementation from functional (system functions description with their properties – period, deadline, priority, etc.) and deployment(processors, buses, devices to be used) models. We tailored this tool-chain to create traces during system execution. Generated output shows activation time of each task, usage of communication ports (size of the queues, instant of events pushed/pulled, etc.) and other relevant execution metrics to be monitored. As a consequence, system engineers can check implementation correctness by comparing simulation and execution metrics

Formal and Informal Methods for Multi-Core Design Space Exploration

We propose a tool-supported methodology for design-space exploration for embedded systems. It provides means to define high-level models of applications and multi-processor architectures and evaluate the performance of different deployment (mapping, scheduling) strategies while taking uncertainty into account. We argue that this extension of the scope of formal verification is important for the viability of the domain.Comment: In Proceedings QAPL 2014, arXiv:1406.156

Automatic Verification of Message-Based Device Drivers

We develop a practical solution to the problem of automatic verification of the interface between device drivers and the OS. Our solution relies on a combination of improved driver architecture and verification tools. It supports drivers written in C and can be implemented in any existing OS, which sets it apart from previous proposals for verification-friendly drivers. Our Linux-based evaluation shows that this methodology amplifies the power of existing verification tools in detecting driver bugs, making it possible to verify properties beyond the reach of traditional techniques.Comment: In Proceedings SSV 2012, arXiv:1211.587