2,112 research outputs found
Structural completeness in propositional logics of dependence
In this paper we prove that three of the main propositional logics of
dependence (including propositional dependence logic and inquisitive logic),
none of which is structural, are structurally complete with respect to a class
of substitutions under which the logics are closed. We obtain an analogues
result with respect to stable substitutions, for the negative variants of some
well-known intermediate logics, which are intermediate theories that are
closely related to inquisitive logic
Propositional Logics of Dependence
In this paper, we study logics of dependence on the propositional level. We
prove that several interesting propositional logics of dependence, including
propositional dependence logic, propositional intuitionistic dependence logic
as well as propositional inquisitive logic, are expressively complete and have
disjunctive or conjunctive normal forms. We provide deduction systems and prove
the completeness theorems for these logics
Relevant Logics Obeying Component Homogeneity
This paper discusses three relevant logics that obey Component Homogeneity - a principle that Goddard and Routley introduce in their project of a logic of significance. The paper establishes two main results. First, it establishes a general characterization result for two families of logic that obey Component Homogeneity - that is, we provide a set of necessary and sufficient conditions for their consequence relations. From this, we derive characterization results for S*fde, dS*fde, crossS*fde. Second, the paper establishes complete sequent calculi for S*fde, dS*fde, crossS*fde. Among the other accomplishments of the paper, we generalize the semantics from Bochvar, Hallden, Deutsch and Daniels, we provide a general recipe to define containment logics, we explore the single-premise/single-conclusion fragment of S*fde, dS*fde, crossS*fdeand the connections between crossS*fde and the logic Eq of equality by Epstein. Also, we present S*fde as a relevant logic of meaninglessness that follows the main philosophical tenets of Goddard and Routley, and we briefly examine three further systems that are closely related to our main logics. Finally, we discuss Routley's criticism to containment logic in light of our results, and overview some open issues
Distributed Reasoning in a Peer-to-Peer Setting: Application to the Semantic Web
In a peer-to-peer inference system, each peer can reason locally but can also
solicit some of its acquaintances, which are peers sharing part of its
vocabulary. In this paper, we consider peer-to-peer inference systems in which
the local theory of each peer is a set of propositional clauses defined upon a
local vocabulary. An important characteristic of peer-to-peer inference systems
is that the global theory (the union of all peer theories) is not known (as
opposed to partition-based reasoning systems). The main contribution of this
paper is to provide the first consequence finding algorithm in a peer-to-peer
setting: DeCA. It is anytime and computes consequences gradually from the
solicited peer to peers that are more and more distant. We exhibit a sufficient
condition on the acquaintance graph of the peer-to-peer inference system for
guaranteeing the completeness of this algorithm. Another important contribution
is to apply this general distributed reasoning setting to the setting of the
Semantic Web through the Somewhere semantic peer-to-peer data management
system. The last contribution of this paper is to provide an experimental
analysis of the scalability of the peer-to-peer infrastructure that we propose,
on large networks of 1000 peers
- …