Combining SysML and AADL for the design, validation and implementation of critical systems

The realization of critical systems goes through multiple phases of specification, design, integration, validation, and testing. It starts from high-level sketches down to the final product. Model-Based Design has been acknowledged as a good conveyor to capture these steps. Yet, there is no universal solution to represent all activities. Two candidates are the OMG-based SysML to perform high-level modeling tasks, and the SAE AADL to perform lower-level ones, down to the implementation. The paper shares an experience on the seamless use of SysML and the AADL to model, validate/verify and implement a flight management system

Validate implementation correctness using simulation: the TASTE approach

High-integrity systems operate in hostile environment and must guarantee a continuous operational state, even if unexpected events happen. In addition, these systems have stringent requirements that must be validated and correctly translated from high-level specifications down to code. All these constraints make the overall development process more time-consuming. This becomes especially complex because the number of system functions keeps increasing over the years. As a result, engineers must validate system implementation and check that its execution conforms to the specifications. To do so, a traditional approach consists in a manual instrumentation of the implementation code to trace system activity while operating. However, this might be error-prone because modifications are not automatic and still made manually. Furthermore, such modifications may have an impact on the actual behavior of the system. In this paper, we present an approach to validate a system implementation by comparing execution against simulation. In that purpose, we adapt TASTE, a set of tools that eases system development by automating each step as much as possible. In particular, TASTE automates system implementation from functional (system functions description with their properties – period, deadline, priority, etc.) and deployment(processors, buses, devices to be used) models. We tailored this tool-chain to create traces during system execution. Generated output shows activation time of each task, usage of communication ports (size of the queues, instant of events pushed/pulled, etc.) and other relevant execution metrics to be monitored. As a consequence, system engineers can check implementation correctness by comparing simulation and execution metrics

A Model-based transformation process to validate and implement high-integrity systems

Despite numerous advances, building High-Integrity Embedded systems remains a complex task. They come with strong requirements to ensure safety, schedulability or security properties; one needs to combine multiple analysis to validate each of them. Model-Based Engineering is an accepted solution to address such complexity: analytical models are derived from an abstraction of the system to be built. Yet, ensuring that all abstractions are semantically consistent, remains an issue, e.g. when performing model checking for assessing safety, and then for schedulability using timed automata, and then when generating code. Complexity stems from the high-level view of the model compared to the low-level mechanisms used. In this paper, we present our approach based on AADL and its behavioral annex to refine iteratively an architecture description. Both application and runtime components are transformed into basic AADL constructs which have a strict counterpart in classical programming languages or patterns for verification. We detail the benefits of this process to enhance analysis and code generation. This work has been integrated to the AADL-tool support OSATE2

Model-based dependability analysis : state-of-the-art, challenges and future outlook

Abstract: Over the past two decades, the study of model-based dependability analysis has gathered significant research interest. Different approaches have been developed to automate and address various limitations of classical dependability techniques to contend with the increasing complexity and challenges of modern safety-critical system. Two leading paradigms have emerged, one which constructs predictive system failure models from component failure models compositionally using the topology of the system. The other utilizes design models - typically state automata - to explore system behaviour through fault injection. This paper reviews a number of prominent techniques under these two paradigms, and provides an insight into their working mechanism, applicability, strengths and challenges, as well as recent developments within these fields. We also discuss the emerging trends on integrated approaches and advanced analysis capabilities. Lastly, we outline the future outlook for model-based dependability analysis

Cyber-physical systems design: transition from functional to architectural models

Normally, the design process of Cyber-Physical Systems (CPSs) starts with the creation of functional models that are used for simulation purposes. However, most of the time such models are not directly reused for the design of the architecture of the target CPS. As a consequence, more efforts than strictly necessary are spent during the CPS architecture design phase. This paper presents an approach called Assisted Transformation of Models (AST), which aims at transforming functional (simulation) models designed in the Simulink environment into architectural models represented in the Architecture Analysis and Design Language. Using AST, designers can perform a smooth transition between these two design phases, with an additional advantage of assuring the coupling between functional and architectural models. The use and benefits of AST are exemplified in the paper in a study devoted to for the design of a typical CPS: an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle.CAPE

Clafer: Lightweight Modeling of Structure, Behaviour, and Variability

Embedded software is growing fast in size and complexity, leading to intimate mixture of complex architectures and complex control. Consequently, software specification requires modeling both structures and behaviour of systems. Unfortunately, existing languages do not integrate these aspects well, usually prioritizing one of them. It is common to develop a separate language for each of these facets. In this paper, we contribute Clafer: a small language that attempts to tackle this challenge. It combines rich structural modeling with state of the art behavioural formalisms. We are not aware of any other modeling language that seamlessly combines these facets common to system and software modeling. We show how Clafer, in a single unified syntax and semantics, allows capturing feature models (variability), component models, discrete control models (automata) and variability encompassing all these aspects. The language is built on top of first order logic with quantifiers over basic entities (for modeling structures) combined with linear temporal logic (for modeling behaviour). On top of this semantic foundation we build a simple but expressive syntax, enriched with carefully selected syntactic expansions that cover hierarchical modeling, associations, automata, scenarios, and Dwyer's property patterns. We evaluate Clafer using a power window case study, and comparing it against other notations that substantially overlap with its scope (SysML, AADL, Temporal OCL and Live Sequence Charts), discussing benefits and perils of using a single notation for the purpose

System to Software Integrity: A Case Study

It is widely acknowledged that the main source of cost for developing high-integrity software systems is their verification. A significant portion of this verification cost is spent assessing that software complies with its requirements. Over the years several different methods have been developed to address this issue, in particular: testing, peer reviews, formal verification and automatic code generation. It is more and more frequent that these verification strategies are mixed within the same system, so as to adopt the most appropriate one for each component. This increases the complexity of the integration phase because it has to cope with multiple formalisms, development and verification methods. Our goal is to propose a pragmatic process to integrate components developed using different methods into a single system and demonstrate that properties already verified for each component in isolation are preserved in their composition. This process leverages AADL as a pivotal modeling language for system specification and relies on specific verifications between the latter and the components developed using heterogeneous modeling and programming languages, namely Simulink for computation intensive parts and Ada/SPARK 2014 for other components. Our paper proceeds as follows. First we provide a high-level overview of our approach and enumerate the current methods for addressing the property preservation problem. Then we illustrate practically our approach using the Nose Gear Challenge problem, a simplified yet complete example of a high-integrity real-time system. We then conclude by comparing our approach to the state of the art