2,555 research outputs found
Group Minds and the Case of Wikipedia
Group-level cognitive states are widely observed in human social systems, but
their discussion is often ruled out a priori in quantitative approaches. In
this paper, we show how reference to the irreducible mental states and
psychological dynamics of a group is necessary to make sense of large scale
social phenomena. We introduce the problem of mental boundaries by reference to
a classic problem in the evolution of cooperation. We then provide an explicit
quantitative example drawn from ongoing work on cooperation and conflict among
Wikipedia editors, showing how some, but not all, effects of individual
experience persist in the aggregate. We show the limitations of methodological
individualism, and the substantial benefits that come from being able to refer
to collective intentions, and attributions of cognitive states of the form
"what the group believes" and "what the group values".Comment: 21 pages, 6 figures; matches published versio
Modeling crowdsourcing as collective problem solving
Crowdsourcing is a process of accumulating the ideas, thoughts or information
from many independent participants, with aim to find the best solution for a
given challenge. Modern information technologies allow for massive number of
subjects to be involved in a more or less spontaneous way. Still, the full
potentials of crowdsourcing are yet to be reached. We introduce a modeling
framework through which we study the effectiveness of crowdsourcing in relation
to the level of collectivism in facing the problem. Our findings reveal an
intricate relationship between the number of participants and the difficulty of
the problem, indicating the optimal size of the crowdsourced group. We discuss
our results in the context of modern utilization of crowdsourcing.Comment: 19 pages, 3 figure
Conflict and Computation on Wikipedia: a Finite-State Machine Analysis of Editor Interactions
What is the boundary between a vigorous argument and a breakdown of
relations? What drives a group of individuals across it? Taking Wikipedia as a
test case, we use a hidden Markov model to approximate the computational
structure and social grammar of more than a decade of cooperation and conflict
among its editors. Across a wide range of pages, we discover a bursty war/peace
structure where the systems can become trapped, sometimes for months, in a
computational subspace associated with significantly higher levels of
conflict-tracking "revert" actions. Distinct patterns of behavior characterize
the lower-conflict subspace, including tit-for-tat reversion. While a fraction
of the transitions between these subspaces are associated with top-down actions
taken by administrators, the effects are weak. Surprisingly, we find no
statistical signal that transitions are associated with the appearance of
particularly anti-social users, and only weak association with significant news
events outside the system. These findings are consistent with transitions being
driven by decentralized processes with no clear locus of control. Models of
belief revision in the presence of a common resource for information-sharing
predict the existence of two distinct phases: a disordered high-conflict phase,
and a frozen phase with spontaneously-broken symmetry. The bistability we
observe empirically may be a consequence of editor turn-over, which drives the
system to a critical point between them.Comment: 23 pages, 3 figures. Matches published version. Code for HMM fitting
available at http://bit.ly/sfihmm ; time series and derived finite state
machines at bit.ly/wiki_hm
The Evolution of Wikipedia's Norm Network
Social norms have traditionally been difficult to quantify. In any particular
society, their sheer number and complex interdependencies often limit a
system-level analysis. One exception is that of the network of norms that
sustain the online Wikipedia community. We study the fifteen-year evolution of
this network using the interconnected set of pages that establish, describe,
and interpret the community's norms. Despite Wikipedia's reputation for
\textit{ad hoc} governance, we find that its normative evolution is highly
conservative. The earliest users create norms that both dominate the network
and persist over time. These core norms govern both content and interpersonal
interactions using abstract principles such as neutrality, verifiability, and
assume good faith. As the network grows, norm neighborhoods decouple
topologically from each other, while increasing in semantic coherence. Taken
together, these results suggest that the evolution of Wikipedia's norm network
is akin to bureaucratic systems that predate the information age.Comment: 22 pages, 9 figures. Matches published version. Data available at
http://bit.ly/wiki_nor
Human Computation and Convergence
Humans are the most effective integrators and producers of information,
directly and through the use of information-processing inventions. As these
inventions become increasingly sophisticated, the substantive role of humans in
processing information will tend toward capabilities that derive from our most
complex cognitive processes, e.g., abstraction, creativity, and applied world
knowledge. Through the advancement of human computation - methods that leverage
the respective strengths of humans and machines in distributed
information-processing systems - formerly discrete processes will combine
synergistically into increasingly integrated and complex information processing
systems. These new, collective systems will exhibit an unprecedented degree of
predictive accuracy in modeling physical and techno-social processes, and may
ultimately coalesce into a single unified predictive organism, with the
capacity to address societies most wicked problems and achieve planetary
homeostasis.Comment: Pre-publication draft of chapter. 24 pages, 3 figures; added
references to page 1 and 3, and corrected typ
- …