A UML Framework for Socially Responsive Resource Usage Protocol

Everything available in our environment which can be used to satisfy our needs, provided, it is technologically accessible, economically feasible and culturally acceptable can be termed as ‘Resource’ .Therefore, planning is essentially required for judicious use of resources. It has importance in a country like India, which has enormous diversity in the availability of resources. This calls for balanced resource planning at the national, state, regional and local levels. This paper shows a UML framework for the implementation of the Socially Responsive Resource Usage Protocol with a case study. It deals with the issues involved in the design of the protocol, the way in which the protocol was built to address the needs of both users and resources with the prime aim of protecting both user and resource rights

A Framework for the Social Description of Resources in Open Environments

The description of public resources such as web site contents, web services or data files in open peer-to-peer networks using some formal framework like RDF usually reflects solely the subjective requirements, opinion and preferences of the resource provider. In some sense, such resource descriptions appear "antisocial" as they do not reflect the social impact of the respective resource and therefore might not provide impartial, reliable assessments. E.g., commercial web sites do not contain any relationship to the information, service and product offers of competing sites, and the assessment of the site by customers, experts or competitors is unknown to users and information agents also. We introduce an open multiagent system framework which derives multidimensional resource descriptions from the possibly conflicting opinions of interacting description agents, which act as representatives for individual, organizational or institutional clients, and compete in the assertion of individual opinions against others to provide a "socially enhanced" solution for this problem. In contrast to the results of majority voting based recommendation systems, the obtained social resource descriptions reflect social structures such as norms and roles which emerge from communication processes