2 research outputs found

    A Comparison between the Zero Forcing Number and the Strong Metric Dimension of Graphs

    Full text link
    The \emph{zero forcing number}, Z(G)Z(G), of a graph GG is the minimum cardinality of a set SS of black vertices (whereas vertices in V(G)−SV(G)-S are colored white) such that V(G)V(G) is turned black after finitely many applications of "the color-change rule": a white vertex is converted black if it is the only white neighbor of a black vertex. The \emph{strong metric dimension}, sdim(G)sdim(G), of a graph GG is the minimum among cardinalities of all strong resolving sets: W⊆V(G)W \subseteq V(G) is a \emph{strong resolving set} of GG if for any u,v∈V(G)u, v \in V(G), there exists an x∈Wx \in W such that either uu lies on an x−vx-v geodesic or vv lies on an x−ux-u geodesic. In this paper, we prove that Z(G)≤sdim(G)+3r(G)Z(G) \le sdim(G)+3r(G) for a connected graph GG, where r(G)r(G) is the cycle rank of GG. Further, we prove the sharp bound Z(G)≤sdim(G)Z(G) \leq sdim(G) when GG is a tree or a unicyclic graph, and we characterize trees TT attaining Z(T)=sdim(T)Z(T)=sdim(T). It is easy to see that sdim(T+e)−sdim(T)sdim(T+e)-sdim(T) can be arbitrarily large for a tree TT; we prove that sdim(T+e)≥sdim(T)−2sdim(T+e) \ge sdim(T)-2 and show that the bound is sharp.Comment: 8 pages, 5 figure
    corecore