Proving Correctness of Imperative Programs by Linearizing Constrained Horn Clauses

We present a method for verifying the correctness of imperative programs which is based on the automated transformation of their specifications. Given a program prog, we consider a partial correctness specification of the form $\{\varphi\}$ prog $\{\psi\}$, where the assertions $\varphi$ and $\psi$ are predicates defined by a set Spec of possibly recursive Horn clauses with linear arithmetic (LA) constraints in their premise (also called constrained Horn clauses). The verification method consists in constructing a set PC of constrained Horn clauses whose satisfiability implies that $\{\varphi\}$ prog $\{\psi\}$ is valid. We highlight some limitations of state-of-the-art constrained Horn clause solving methods, here called LA-solving methods, which prove the satisfiability of the clauses by looking for linear arithmetic interpretations of the predicates. In particular, we prove that there exist some specifications that cannot be proved valid by any of those LA-solving methods. These specifications require the proof of satisfiability of a set PC of constrained Horn clauses that contain nonlinear clauses (that is, clauses with more than one atom in their premise). Then, we present a transformation, called linearization, that converts PC into a set of linear clauses (that is, clauses with at most one atom in their premise). We show that several specifications that could not be proved valid by LA-solving methods, can be proved valid after linearization. We also present a strategy for performing linearization in an automatic way and we report on some experimental results obtained by using a preliminary implementation of our method.Comment: To appear in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming (TPLP), Proceedings of ICLP 201

Programmiersprachen und Rechenkonzepte

Seit 1984 veranstaltet die GI-Fachgruppe "Programmiersprachen und Rechenkonzepte", die aus den ehemaligen Fachgruppen 2.1.3 "Implementierung von Programmiersprachen" und 2.1.4 "Alternative Konzepte für Sprachen und Rechner" hervorgegangen ist, regelmäßig im Frühjahr einen Workshop im Physikzentrum Bad Honnef. Das Treffen dient in erster Linie dem gegenseitigen Kennenlernen, dem Erfahrungsaustausch, der Diskussion und der Vertiefung gegenseitiger Kontakte

Scalable Logic Defined Static Analysis

Logic languages such as Datalog have been proposed as a method for specifying flexible and customisable static analysers. Using Datalog, various classes of static analyses can be expressed precisely and succinctly, requiring fewer lines of code than hand-crafted analysers. In this paradigm, a static analysis specification is encoded by a set of declarative logic rules and an o -the-shelf solver is used to compute the result of the static analysis. Unfortunately, when large-scale analyses are employed, Datalog-based tools currently fail to scale in comparison to hand-crafted static analysers. As a result, Datalog-based analysers have largely remained an academic curiosity, rather than industrially respectful tools. This thesis outlines our e orts in understanding the sources of performance limitations in Datalog-based tools. We propose a novel evaluation technique that is predicated on the fact that in the case of static analysis, the logical specification is a design time artefact and hence does not change during evaluation. Thus, instead of directly evaluating Datalog rules, our approach leverages partial evaluation to synthesise a specialised static analyser from these rules. This approach enables a novel indexing optimisations that automatically selects an optimal set of indexes to speedup and minimise memory usage in the Datalog computation. Lastly, we explore the case of more expressive logics, namely, constrained Horn clause and their use in proving the correctness of programs. We identify a bottleneck in various symbolic evaluation algorithms that centre around Craig interpolation. We propose a method of improving these evaluation algorithms by a proposing a method of guiding theorem provers to discover relevant interpolants with respect to the input logic specification. The culmination of our work is implemented in a general-purpose and highperformance tool called Souffl´e. We describe Souffl´e and evaluate its performance experimentally, showing significant improvement over alternative techniques and its scalability in real-world industrial use cases

A framework for program reasoning based on constraint traces

Ph.DDOCTOR OF PHILOSOPH