3,690 research outputs found
A heuristic-based approach to code-smell detection
Encapsulation and data hiding are central tenets of the object oriented paradigm. Deciding what data and behaviour to form into a class and where to draw the line between its public and private details can make the difference between a class that is an understandable, flexible and reusable abstraction and one which is not. This decision is a difficult one and may easily result in poor encapsulation which can then have serious implications for a number of system qualities. It is often hard to identify such encapsulation problems within large software systems until they cause a maintenance problem (which is usually too late) and attempting to perform such analysis manually can also be tedious and error prone. Two of the common encapsulation problems that can arise as a consequence of this decomposition process are data classes and god classes. Typically, these two problems occur together â data classes are lacking in functionality that has typically been sucked into an over-complicated and domineering god class. This paper describes the architecture of a tool which automatically detects data and god classes that has been developed as a plug-in for the Eclipse IDE. The technique has been evaluated in a controlled study on two large open source systems which compare the tool results to similar work by Marinescu, who employs a metrics-based approach to detecting such features. The study provides some valuable insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the two approache
Trustworthy Refactoring via Decomposition and Schemes: A Complex Case Study
Widely used complex code refactoring tools lack a solid reasoning about the
correctness of the transformations they implement, whilst interest in proven
correct refactoring is ever increasing as only formal verification can provide
true confidence in applying tool-automated refactoring to industrial-scale
code. By using our strategic rewriting based refactoring specification
language, we present the decomposition of a complex transformation into smaller
steps that can be expressed as instances of refactoring schemes, then we
demonstrate the semi-automatic formal verification of the components based on a
theoretical understanding of the semantics of the programming language. The
extensible and verifiable refactoring definitions can be executed in our
interpreter built on top of a static analyser framework.Comment: In Proceedings VPT 2017, arXiv:1708.0688
Evaluation of Kermeta for Solving Graph-based Problems
Kermeta is a meta-language for specifying the structure and behavior of graphs of interconnected objects called models. In this paper,\ud
we show that Kermeta is relatively suitable for solving three graph-based\ud
problems. First, Kermeta allows the specification of generic model\ud
transformations such as refactorings that we apply to different metamodels\ud
including Ecore, Java, and Uml. Second, we demonstrate the extensibility\ud
of Kermeta to the formal language Alloy using an inter-language model\ud
transformation. Kermeta uses Alloy to generate recommendations for\ud
completing partially specified models. Third, we show that the Kermeta\ud
compiler achieves better execution time and memory performance compared\ud
to similar graph-based approaches using a common case study. The\ud
three solutions proposed for those graph-based problems and their\ud
evaluation with Kermeta according to the criteria of genericity,\ud
extensibility, and performance are the main contribution of the paper.\ud
Another contribution is the comparison of these solutions with those\ud
proposed by other graph-based tools
Subjects, Models, Languages, Transformations
Discussions about model-driven approaches tend to be hampered by terminological confusion. This is at least partially caused by a lack of formal precision in defining the basic concepts, including that of "model" and "thing being modelled" - which we call subject in this paper. We propose a minimal criterion that a model should fulfill: essentially, it should come equipped with a clear and unambiguous membership test; in other words, a notion of which subjects it models. We then go on to discuss a certain class of models of models that we call languages, which apart from defining their own membership test also determine membership of their members. Finally, we introduce transformations on each of these layers: a subject transformation is essentially a pair of subjects, a model transformation is both a pair of models and a model of pairs (namely, subject transformations), and a language transformation is both a pair of languages and a language of model transformations. We argue that our framework has the benefits of formal precision (there can be no doubt about whether something satifies our criteria for being a model, a language or a transformation) and minimality (it is hard to imagine a case of modelling or transformation not having the characterstics that we propose)
Generic Model Refactorings
Many modeling languages share some common concepts and principles. For example, Java, MOF, and UML share some aspects of the concepts\ud
of classes, methods, attributes, and inheritance. However, model\ud
transformations such as refactorings specified for a given language\ud
cannot be readily reused for another language because their related\ud
metamodels may be structurally different. Our aim is to enable a\ud
flexible reuse of model transformations across various metamodels.\ud
Thus, in this paper, we present an approach allowing the specification\ud
of generic model transformations, in particular refactorings, so\ud
that they can be applied to different metamodels. Our approach relies\ud
on two mechanisms: (1) an adaptation based mainly on the weaving\ud
of aspects; (2) the notion of model typing, an extension of object\ud
typing in the model-oriented context. We validated our approach by\ud
performing some experiments that consisted of specifying three well\ud
known refactorings (Encapsulate Field, Move Method, and Pull Up Method)\ud
and applying each of them onto three different metamodels (Java,\ud
MOF, and UML)
Analysis of Feature Models Using Alloy: A Survey
Feature Models (FMs) are a mechanism to model variability among a family of
closely related software products, i.e. a software product line (SPL). Analysis
of FMs using formal methods can reveal defects in the specification such as
inconsistencies that cause the product line to have no valid products. A
popular framework used in research for FM analysis is Alloy, a light-weight
formal modeling notation equipped with an efficient model finder. Several works
in the literature have proposed different strategies to encode and analyze FMs
using Alloy. However, there is little discussion on the relative merits of each
proposal, making it difficult to select the most suitable encoding for a
specific analysis need. In this paper, we describe and compare those strategies
according to various criteria such as the expressivity of the FM notation or
the efficiency of the analysis. This survey is the first comparative study of
research targeted towards using Alloy for FM analysis. This review aims to
identify all the best practices on the use of Alloy, as a part of a framework
for the automated extraction and analysis of rich FMs from natural language
requirement specifications.Comment: In Proceedings FMSPLE 2016, arXiv:1603.0857
- âŠ