2 research outputs found

    bb-invariant edges in essentially 4-edge-connected near-bipartite cubic bricks

    Full text link
    A {\em brick} is a non-bipartite matching covered graph without non-trivial tight cuts. Bricks are building blocks of matching covered graphs. We say that an edge ee in a brick GG is {\em bb-invariant} if Gβˆ’eG-e is matching covered and a tight cut decomposition of Gβˆ’eG-e contains exactly one brick. A 2-edge-connected cubic graph is {\em essentially 4-edge-connected} if it does not contain nontrivial 3-cuts. A brick GG is {\em near-bipartite} if it has a pair of edges {e1,e2}\{e_1, e_2\} such that Gβˆ’{e1,e2}G-\{e_1,e_2\} is bipartite and matching covered. Kothari, de Carvalho, Lucchesi and Little proved that each essentially 4-edge-connected cubic non-near-bipartite brick GG, distinct from the Petersen graph, has at least ∣V(G)∣|V(G)| bb-invariant edges. Moreover, they made a conjecture: every essentially 4-edge-connected cubic near-bipartite brick GG, distinct from K4K_4, has at least ∣V(G)∣/2|V(G)|/2 bb-invariant edges. We confirm the conjecture in this paper. Furthermore, all the essentially 4-edge-connected cubic near-bipartite bricks, the numbers of bb-invariant edges of which attain the lower bound, are presented

    On essentially 4-edge-connected cubic bricks

    Full text link
    Lov\'asz (1987) proved that every matching covered graph GG may be uniquely decomposed into a list of bricks (nonbipartite) and braces (bipartite); we let b(G)b(G) denote the number of bricks. An edge ee is removable if Gβˆ’eG-e is also matching covered; furthermore, ee is bb-invariant if b(Gβˆ’e)=1b(G-e)=1, and ee is quasi-bb-invariant if b(Gβˆ’e)=2b(G-e)=2. (Each edge of the Petersen graph is quasi-bb-invariant.) A brick GG is near-bipartite if it has a pair of edges {e,f}\{e,f\} so that Gβˆ’eβˆ’fG-e-f is matching covered and bipartite; such a pair {e,f}\{e,f\} is a removable doubleton. (Each of K4K_4 and the triangular prism C6β€Ύ\overline{C_6} has three removable doubletons.) Carvalho, Lucchesi and Murty (2002) proved a conjecture of Lov\'asz which states that every brick, distinct from K4K_4, C6β€Ύ\overline{C_6} and the Petersen graph, has a bb-invariant edge. A cubic graph is essentially 44-edge-connected if it is 22-edge-connected and if its only 33-cuts are the trivial ones; it is well-known that each such graph is either a brick or a brace; we provide a graph-theoretical proof of this fact. We prove that if GG is any essentially 44-edge-connected cubic brick then its edge-set may be partitioned into three (possibly empty) sets: (i) edges that participate in a removable doubleton, (ii) bb-invariant edges, and (iii) quasi-bb-invariant edges; our Main Theorem states that if GG has two adjacent quasi-bb-invariant edges, say e1e_1 and e2e_2, then either GG is the Petersen graph or the (near-bipartite) Cubeplex graph, or otherwise, each edge of GG (distinct from e1e_1 and e2e_2) is bb-invariant. As a corollary, we deduce that each essentially 44-edge-connected cubic non-near-bipartite brick GG, distinct from the Petersen graph, has at least ∣V(G)∣|V(G)| bb-invariant edges.Comment: Accepted for publication in Electronic Journal of Combinatorics (December 2019
    corecore