How Robots’ Unintentional Metacommunication Affects Human–Robot Interactions. A Systemic Approach

In this paper, we theoretically address the relevance of unintentional and inconsistent interactional elements in human-robot interactions. We argue that elements failing, or poorly succeeding, to reproduce a humanlike interaction create significant consequences in human-robot relational patterns and may affect human-human relations. When considering social interactions as systems, the absence of a precise interactional element produces a general reshaping of the interactional pattern, eventually generating new types of interactional settings. As an instance of this dynamic, we study the absence of metacommunicative abilities in social artifacts. Then, we analyze the pragmatic consequences of the aforementioned absence through the lens of Paul Watzlawick’s interactionist theory. We suggest that a fixed complementary interactional setting may be produced because of the asymmetric understanding, between robots and humans, of metacommunication. We highlight the psychological implications of this interactional asymmetry within Jessica Benjamin’s concept of “mutual recognition”. Finally, we point out the possible shift of dysfunctional interactional patterns from human-robot interactions to human-human ones

로봇의 신체 언어가 사회적 특성과 인간 유사성에 미치는 영향

학위논문 (석사) -- 서울대학교 대학원 : 사회과학대학 심리학과, 2021. 2. Sowon Hahn.The present study investigated the role of robots’ body language on perceptions of social qualities and human-likeness in robots. In experiment 1, videos of a robot’s body language varying in expansiveness were used to evaluate the two aspects. In experiment 2, videos of social interactions containing the body languages in experiment 1 were used to further examine the effects of robots’ body language on these aspects. Results suggest that a robot conveying open body language are evaluated higher on perceptions of social characteristics and human-likeness compared to a robot with closed body language. These effects were not found in videos of social interactions (experiment 2), which suggests that other features play significant roles in evaluations of a robot. Nonetheless, current research provides evidence of the importance of robots’ body language in judgments of social characteristics and human-likeness. While measures of social qualities and human-likeness favor robots that convey open body language, post-experiment interviews revealed that participants expect robots to alleviate feelings of loneliness and empathize with them, which require more diverse body language in addition to open body language. Thus, robotic designers are encouraged to develop robots capable of expressing a wider range of motion. By enabling complex movements, more natural communications between humans and robots are possible, which allows humans to consider robots as social partners.본 연구는 로봇의 신체 언어가 사회적 특성과 인간과의 유사성에 대한 인간의 인식에 미치는 영향을 탐색하였다. 실험 1에서는 로봇의 개방적 신체 언어가 묘사된 영상과 폐쇄적 신체 언어가 묘사된 영상을 통해 이러한 세 가지 측면을 살펴보았다. 실험 2에서는 실험 1의 신체 언어가 포함된 로봇과 사람 간의 상호작용 영상을 활용하여 로봇의 신체 언어가 위 두 가지 측면에 미치는 영향을 탐색하였다. 결과적으로, 사람들은 폐쇄적 신체 언어를 표현하는 로봇에 비해 개방적 신체 언어를 표현하는 로봇을 사회적 특성과 인간과의 유사성에 대한 인식 면에서 더 높게 평가한다는 것을 확인하였다. 그러나 사람과의 상호작용을 담은 영상을 통해서는 이러한 효과가 발견되지 않았으며, 이는 실험 2에 포함된 음성 등의 다른 특징이 로봇에 대한 평가에 중요한 역할을 한다는 것을 시사한다. 그럼에도 불구하고, 본 연구는 로봇의 신체 언어가 사회적 특성 및 인간과의 유사성에 대한 인식의 중요한 요인이 된다는 근거를 제공한다. 사회적 특성과 인간과의 유사성의 척도에서는 개방적 신체 언어를 표현하는 로봇이 더 높게 평가되었지만, 실험 후 인터뷰에서는 로봇이 외로운 감정을 완화하고 공감하기를 기대하는 것으로 나타나 이 상황들에 적절한 폐쇄적 신체 언어 또한 배제할 수 없다고 해석할 수 있다. 이에 따라 본 연구에서는 로봇 디자이너들이 더욱 다양한 범위의 움직임을 표현할 수 있는 로봇을 개발하도록 장려한다. 그렇다면 섬세한 움직임에 따른 자연스러운 의사소통을 통해 인간이 로봇을 사회적 동반자로 인식할 수 있을 것이다.Chapter 1. Introduction 1 1. Motivation 1 2. Theoretical Background and Previous Research 3 3. Purpose of Study 12 Chapter 2. Experiment 1 13 1. Objective and Hypotheses 13 2. Methods 13 3. Results 21 4. Discussion 31 Chapter 3. Experiment 2 34 1. Objective and Hypotheses 34 2. Methods 35 3. Results 38 4. Discussion 50 Chapter 4. Conclusion 52 Chapter 5. General Discussion 54 References 60 Appendix 70 국문초록 77Maste

“Sorry, It Was My Fault”: Repairing Trust in Human-Robot Interactions

Robots have been playing an increasingly important role in human life, but their performance is yet far from perfection. Based on extant literature in interpersonal, organizational, and human-machine communication, the current study develops a three-fold categorization of technical failures (i.e., logic, semantic, and syntax failures) commonly observed in human-robot interactions from the interactants’ end, investigating it together with four trust repair strategies: internal-attribution apology, external-attribution apology, denial, and no repair. The 743 observations conducted through an online experiment reveals there exist some nuances in participants’ perceived division between competence- and integrity-based trust violations, given the ontological differences between humans and machines. The findings also suggest prior propositions about trust repair from the perspective of attribution theory only explain part of the variance, in addition to some significant main effects of failure types and repair methods on HRI-based trust

Trust, Trusting and Trustworthiness in the Words of Survivors of Child Sexual Abuse

Survivors of Child Sexual Abuse are known to hold silence around the abusive events and their trauma distress. Existing scholarship suggests damaged abilities to trust as one reason for this, and thus trust becomes located as an impaired propensity in the mind of the survivor. Survivors and service providers alike report trust as important when accessing mental, physical, judicial or religious services, and yet very little empirical evidence exists which interrogates the mechanism of trust building, as opposed to generalised trust propensity. Epistemology into trust is hampered by obscured and conflated definitions, and in mental health settings by the apparent dislocation of the survivor’s propensity to trust from the trustworthiness of their trustee - be that an individual, an institution or society. This study has interrogated trust for CSA survivors using a Mad Studies paradigm to address the research questions: How do survivors describe their own trusting abilities? What previous relational experiences inform survivors’ ability and/or willingness to trust? How do survivors evaluate potential trustees? How does trust influence disclosure? Seventeen participants with a range of characteristics were recruited into the study, and Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis used to analyse the data. The researcher is a CSA survivor and an autoethnographic account of her interaction with, and shaping of, the data offers a robust reflexivity to evidence the quality of the study. The findings demarcate generalised and relational trust; present a ‘trust enactment model’ of relational trust; delineate the process of building/repairing trust; and advance the utility of ‘transactional trust’. The study foregrounds the centrality of trustee trustworthiness, thus challenging survivor trust deficiency as the sole trust-component in relationality when survivors seek services. The study identifies an epistemological lacuna regarding trustee trustworthiness, and indicates the necessity of further research to establish parameters of trustworthiness when working with CSA survivors