What makes stroke rehabilitation patients complex? Clinician perspectives and the role of discharge pressure

Abstract

Background: Approximately 80% of people who survive a stroke have on average five other conditions and a wide range of psychosocial issues. Attention to biopsychosocial issues has led to the identification of ‘complex patients’. No single definition of ‘patient complexity’ exists, therefore applied health researchers seek to understand ‘patient complexity’ as it relates to a specific clinical context. Objective: To understand how ‘patient complexity’ is conceptualized by clinicians, and to position the findings within the existing literature on patient complexity. Methods: A qualitative descriptive approach was utilized. Twenty-three rehabilitation clinicians participated in four focus groups. Results: Five elements of patient complexity were identified:  medical/functional issues, social determinant factors, social/family support, personal characteristics, and health system factors. Using biopsychosocial factors to identify complexity results in all patients being complex; operationalization of the definition led to the identification of systemic elements. A disconnect between acute, inpatient rehabilitation and community services was identified as a trigger for increased complexity. Conclusions: Patient complexity is not a dichotomous state. If applying existing complexity definitions, all patients are complex. This study extends the understanding by suggesting a structural element of complexity from manageable to less manageable complexity based on ability to discharge.Journal of Comorbidity 2016;6(2):35–4