International audienceFor 50 years, bisphenol A (BPA) has been extensively used as a colour developer in thermal printing papers. The European Union and several other countries have drastically restricted BPA's use in thermal paper, due to its endocrine-disrupting properties. Consequently, bisphenol S (BPS) and Pergafast 201 (PF201) are increasingly used as substitutes, despite their percutaneous absorption remains poorly documented. We conducted an ex vivo study to achieve a comparative assessment of the skin absorption and metabolism of BPA, BPS and PF201. Tritium-labelled compounds were topically applied to viable human skin explants mounted on static Franz diffusion cells, providing complete mass-balance data compliant with OECD recommendations (n° 428, 28, 156). Absorbed doses were 5.1 ± 2.4 % for BPA, and below 1 % for BPS and PF201 (BPA > BPS ∼ PF201). Dermal delivery reached 16.1 ± 3.5 % for BPA, 8.7 ± 4.2 % for BPS and 3.5 ± 1.3 % for PF201 (BPA > BPS > PF201). Additional experiments were conducted for PF201 at five different doses (7.8-638.5 ng/cm2) to determine skin permeation parameters. PF201's absorbed dose and dermal delivery remained constant, its permeability coefficient was found to range between 0.63 and 2.0 × 10⁻⁶ cm/h, and its flux between 0.75 and 84.0 × 10⁻3 ng/cm2/h. No PF201 metabolism or degradation were observed in skin explants. Our results demonstrate that despite limited absorption, PF201 remains in the skin after 24 h, suggesting prolonged bioavailability. This study closes major knowledge gaps related to the absorption and metabolism of PF201 through viable human skin and provides useful data for improved risk assessment
Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.