CORP – Competence Center of Urban and Regional Planning
Abstract
The gap between citizens’ aspirational desires for public involvement quality in planning and the perceived
current level, a.k.a. the Arnstein Gap, is well-documented (Bailey and Grossardt 2006, 2010). Authors Bailey
and Grossardt have demonstrated in recent work how this Arnstein Gap is consistent across different
geographical contexts and that it has remained more or less consistent across twenty-five years of these
measurements (Bailey 2019, Bailey and Grossardt 2025). To the degree that Arnstein Gap presents a societal
problem, for instance, a large Gap reflects lack of public confidence in professional activities and plans, and
thereby signals a lack of legitimacy in the planning system overall, it is a problem that merits attention,
analysis, and efforts directed at solution – even if these can only ever be partial (Weymouth and Hartz-Karp
2019).
Building on previous work including CORP here I explore strategies that planners can use for delivering
strong public involvement performance and thereby nudging the Arnstein Gap smaller. Strategically
avoiding engineering process aims around slippery, opaque, loaded and contradictory terms including “trust”
and “consensus” (Shakeri 2025), this paper applies the QICE (Quality, Inclusion, Clarity, and Efficiency)
framework for public involvement design and measurement and explores how QICE allows planners to
address the competing desires of multiple stakeholder groups including citizens, planners, and project
managers and sponsors (Bailey et al. 2015). Performance measurements are presented and the impacts are
discussed using extensive real-world data from more than twenty years of project work. With
acknowledgment to Freddie Mercury and his bandmates, this is not really “A Kind of Magic”; instead, these
results suggest that public involvement process design using a multistakeholder framework in conjunction
with careful operationalization that includes logical method selection and sequencing can deliver high
performance across multiple criteria
Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.