Abstract

The development of an effective HIV-1 vaccine is of paramount importance to global health. Here, we compared the influence of two adjuvants, Escherichia coli double-mutant heat-labile toxin (dmLT) and alum, on the protective immunity induced by a cyclically permuted trimeric HIV-1 envelope gp120 protein (CycP-gp120) boost. Two groups of rhesus macaques received two modified vaccinia Ankara (MVA)/SHIV C.1086 primes followed by a CycP-gp120 protein boost adjuvanted with either dmLT (n = 9) or alum (n = 10). A group of unvaccinated macaques (n = 8) served as controls. All animals were intrarectally challenged with heterologous SHIV.CH505.375H.dCT weekly for 7 weeks. Following the challenge, dmLT-adjuvanted animals showed significant protection with a vaccine efficacy of 60.8% per exposure (p = 0.0246). Alum-adjuvanted animals did not show significant protection (p = 0.1575). Both adjuvants induced comparable envelope-specific binding antibody in serum and rectal secretions with broad V1V2 scaffold-binding specificity. IL-6 plasma concentration correlated positively with V1V2 scaffold-binding and increased after vaccination with both adjuvants. With respect to CD4 T cells, dmLT induced higher frequencies of proliferating central memory (T) and ICOS cells in blood compared to alum. However, these proliferating CD4 T cells showed a decrease in the proportion of gut-homing receptor α4β7-expressing cells in the dmLT group compared to the alum group at week 2 post-protein boost. The V1V2 scaffold-specific IgG, proliferating T and ICOS CD4 T-cell frequencies, and plasma IL-6 concentration associated positively with protection. These data demonstrate that the vaccine adjuvants dmLT and alum differentially modulate protective helper T-cell responses induced by the CycP-gp120 protein, highlighting the importance of an appropriate adjuvant for eliciting a protective immune response against HIV-1

Similar works

Full text

Having an issue?

Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.

Licence: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/