Scientific representations and their constituent concepts
change over time to reflect improvements in our understanding
of the world. Similar improvements in understanding lead to
changes in DNN-procured representations and their features. In
this paper, we investigate whether useful methodological
practices in concept change and in feature change carry across
the two types of representations. We argue that there is indeed considerable potential for methodological cross-pollination and offer some examples of how such benefit may be derived
Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.