The current mainstream strategy to allow a high share of variable renewable energy feed-in is mainly aimed at enabling new flexibility resources, but at high penetration, these resources are unlikely to be sufficient. On the contrary, the firmness and dispatchability of solar/wind could reduce/eliminate any demand for additional flexibility. In this work, we showed that solar/wind facilities can produce both variable/intermittent and baseload/dispatchable 24/365 energy by installing battery energy storage, grid forming inverters and suitable power plant controller. Then, we propose a new market design more suitable for this generation splitting approach. Using Italy as a case study, we have shown through energy simulations and cost optimization/analysis that the proposed market reform, combined with a firm energy feed-in tariff (always below 100 €/MWh), would make it profitable to reduce variable energy feed-in from large PV/wind power plants and related induced flexibility requirements by 20 %–30 %–40 %, in 2024–2030–2050. This flexibility reduction increases to 50 %–60 %–70 % dealing with the joint generation of an optimal mix of PV/wind farms. In addition, in 2050, for PV and the optimal mix of solar/wind systems, incentives below 100 €/MWh will push producers to generate only dispatchable energy. We also showed that our approach could solve or mitigate the significant misalignments between the current market structure and the techno-economic characteristics of renewables: wholesale market price volatility and cannibalization, growth of balancing prices and system-charges required to increase grid hosting capacity and adequacy
Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.