The online Steiner cover problem in hypergraphs (\treePN) is a generalization of the online Steiner tree problem in graphs.
An edge-weighted hypergraph H=(V,E,w) is given offline and a set of terminal vertices R⊆V is requested sequentially online.
Upon receiving each request ri∈R an algorithm for the problem must buy some edges Pi⊆E which connect ri to the previous solution.
The solution after satisfying the ith request is then the union over all edges bought up to that point, Fi=⋃j=1iPj.
The goal is to minimize the total cost of the solution to connect the requests, i.e., for ∣R∣=n let F=Fn, then we want to minimize ∑e∈Fw(e).
The generalized \treePN (\forestPN) is a generalization of both the \treePN and the Steiner forest problem in graphs.
Again, we are given an edge-weighted hypergraph H=(V,E,w) offline, but instead of a set of terminals as the online portion of the input we are given a set of terminal pairs R⊆V×V.
Upon receiving the ith request pair pi∈R an algorithm for this second problem must buy some set of edges Pi⊂E which connect the terminals from pi.
We define the instantaneous solution after connecting request pi as before, so Fi=⋃j=1iPi and the final solution is again denoted F=Fn for a request sequence of size ∣R∣=n.
The worst-case performance of an online algorithm is measured by the competitive ratio, which is the ratio between the cost of a solution obtained by the online algorithm to that of an optimal offline solution.
Besides some simpler preliminary results, we obtain a lower bound on the competitive ratio for \treePN (which also applies to \forestPN) of Ω(klogn), where k is the rank of the hypergraph, and a matching upper bound for the simple Greedy algorithm.
For \forestPN we show that the simple Greedy algorithm is O(klog2n)-competitive and provide another algorithm, called GGSC, which achieves a competitive ratio of O(klogn)
Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.