How is dysfunctional breathing characterised in the clinical literature? A scoping review.

Abstract

Introduction Dysfunctional breathing (DB) is a complex condition that affects health and quality of life. It can occur alone or with other conditions and presents with various symptoms. Despite its prevalence, there is no consensus among healthcare professionals on its definition, diagnosis, or classification. Aims & Methods This scoping review aimed to explore how dysfunctional breathing is characterised across the literature. To achieve this, a comprehensive search strategy was employed, covering both peer-reviewed and grey literature from relevant academic databases and websites. Results Seventy one relevant sources published between 2001 to 2024 were identified resulting in 6 key themes. These consisted of ‘Defining DB’ (69% of studies), ‘Diagnosing and Assessing DB’ (86%), ‘Symptoms and Dimensions’ (87%), ‘Comorbidities’ (64%),’ Psychophysiological Links’ (43%), and ‘Classification’ (50%). Conclusion There are inconsistencies in the terminology, assessment methods, and classification systems used to describe (DB). This highlights a lack of standardisation across the literature. The use of multiple, and at times overlapping, definitions for the same condition poses a significant challenge for clinical decision-making and treatment planning. To address these issues, future research should prioritise achieving consensus across these domains acknowledging the multidimensional nature of the condition

    Similar works

    Full text

    thumbnail-image

    Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive

    redirect
    Last time updated on 08/12/2025

    Having an issue?

    Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.

    Licence: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/