\u3cem\u3eNavahine v. Hawai\u27i Dept. of Transportation\u3c/em\u3e: The Keiki Will Lead Us

Abstract

The author analyzes the landmark case Navahine v. Hawaiʻi Department of Transportation, which culminated in the world’s first constitutional climate settlement. Catherine Smith, serving as an expert for the youth plaintiffs, situates the case within Hawaiʻi’s legal tradition of prioritizing children’s rights and intergenerational equity. She explores the evolution of children’s constitutional protections, contrasting Hawaiʻi’s progressive jurisprudence with the dominant adult-centric legal framework on the mainland. She critiques four recurring analytical missteps in U.S. courts that marginalize children’s interests and highlights Hawaiʻi’s public trust doctrine and cultural values, such as the Aloha Spirit, as models for addressing climate-related harms. Ultimately, the author argues for centering children’s rights to ensure meaningful legal responses to climate change

Similar works

Full text

thumbnail-image

Washington and Lee University School of Law

redirect
Last time updated on 23/11/2025

This paper was published in Washington and Lee University School of Law.

Having an issue?

Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.