Implementing this approach guarantees that the sustainability strategic goals and objectives of the client organisation are met and simultaneously addresses both environmental
objectives and the preferences and needs of the end-user. This research emphasises the
crucial necessity to equip sustainability consultants with the tools to make informed decisions that prioritise impactful sustainable solutions, rather than simply targeting high
accreditation scores and levels.
The research introduces an optimised framework for sustainable developments that constructs a decision-making matrix focused on achieving desired impacts, showcasing Net-Zero as an example theme. This framework integrates standards such as LEED and
the WELL Building Standards. Additionally, the framework aligns with the United
Nations Sustainable Development Goals (UNSDGs), striving for equilibrium among the
sustainability pillars. For practitioners involved in the credit selection process, the proposed framework offers a roadmap on how to optimise sustainability value by focusing
on the impact, while balancing both the business value of stakeholders and the comfort
and satisfaction of end-users. Uniquely, this research employs Backcasting as a novel
method within the sustainability credit selection framework, forecasting future impacts
and then interpret these projections retrospectively to refine credit selection strategies
for optimal sustainability results
Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.
Licence: All items in ROS are protected by the Creative Commons copyright license (http://creativecommons.or