A face-to-face survey on the practice of ophthalmic clinicians in the management of dry eye disease in patients undergoing cataract surgery

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Dry eye disease (DED) can impact the accuracy of biometry measurements prior to cataract surgery (CS), influence visual performance post-CS, and can be exacerbated by CS. We performed a survey to evaluate the DED practice of clinicians directly caring for CS patients. DESIGN: Prospective face-to-face survey. METHOD: Face-to-face survey consisting of 12 questions relating to CS clinicians' estimations of DED pre- and post-CS, dry eye tests performed, and the management of DED. RESULT: There were one hundred and twenty-seven responders (39% consultants, 37% trainees/fellows, 8% associate specialists, 6% specialty doctors, 8% optometrists, 2% nurse specialists), with a 100% response rate. Sixty-seven percent routinely assessed for DED pre-CS, with 81% anticipating mild to moderative negative effects of CS on DED. Approximately 75% estimated that over 10% of pre-operative patients had asymptomatic DED, with another 10% or more suffering symptomatic DED. Almost 80% estimated that 10% or more of patients suffered DED post-CS. More DED tests were performed pre- compared to post-operatively (p = 0.02). More consultants performed dry eye tests post-operatively compared to non-consultants (p = 0.02). Most common treatment options included lubricating drops (95%), lid hygiene (75%) and night ointment/gels (54%). Seventy-six percent of surgeons performing CS stated they coated the ocular surface with an ophthalmic visco-surgical device and 34% limited intra-operative light exposure peri-operatively to limit DED. DISCUSSION: Despite the anticipated negative effects of CS on DED, 1 in 3 clinicians in our survey were not assessing routinely for DED prior to CS, and fewer dry eye tests were performed post-operatively compared to pre-surgery.This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).Journal content freely available via Open Access. Some content may be unavailable due to publisher embargo. Click on the 'Additional link' above to access the full-text