Abstract

BACKGROUND: Large-scale multicentre studies are needed to understand complex relationships between the gut microbiota, health and disease. Interrogating the mucosal microbiota may identify important biology not captured by stool analysis. Gold standard tissue cryopreservation ('flash freezing') limits large-scale study feasibility. We aimed to compare gut microbiota in gold standard and pragmatic mucosal biopsy storage conditions. METHODS: We collected endoscopic recto-sigmoid biopsies from 20 adults with inflammatory bowel disease. Biopsies were preserved using three methods: (i) flash freezing (most proximal and distal biopsy sites); (ii) nucleic acid preservative reagents (QIAGEN Allprotect®, Invitrogen RNAlater™, and Zymo DNA/RNA Shield™); and (iii) formalin fixation with paraffin embedding (FFPE), which is used to preserve tissue for clinical histopathology within healthcare settings. Microbiota were sequenced on the MiSeq platform (V4 region, 16S rRNA gene). FINDINGS: Tissue microbiota were consistent between most proximal and distal tissue suggesting any within-patient variation observed reflected storage condition, not biopsy location. There was no significant difference in alpha-diversity or microbial community profiles of reagent-preserved versus gold standard tissue. FFPE community structure was significantly dissimilar to other tissue samples, driven by differential relative abundance of obligate gut anaerobes; Faecalibacterium, Anaerostipes and Lachnospiraceae. Despite these differences, tissue microbiota grouped by participant regardless of preservation and storage conditions. INTERPRETATION: Preservative reagents offer a convenient alternative to flash freezing tissue in prospective large-scale mucosal microbiota studies. Whilst less comparable, FFPE provides potential for retrospective microbiota studies using historical samples. FUNDING: Medical Research Council (MR/T032162/1) and The Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust (G-2002-04255).This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).Journal content freely available via Open Access. Some content may be unavailable due to publisher embargo. Click on the 'Additional link' above to access the full-text

Similar works

Full text

thumbnail-image

Royal Devon and Exeter Research Repository

redirect
Last time updated on 09/10/2025

This paper was published in Royal Devon and Exeter Research Repository.

Having an issue?

Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.