Whitley v. Greyhound Lines, Inc [Nevada], 141 Nev. Adv. Op. 33 (July. 11, 2025)

Abstract

The Nevada Supreme Court held that the “effects test” from Calder v. Jones applies only to intentional torts and was therefore inapplicable to the negligence claims in this case. Nevertheless, the Court affirmed dismissal for lack of personal jurisdiction because Greyhound’s alleged negligence did not arise from its contracts with Nevada

Similar works

Full text

thumbnail-image

Scholarly Commons @ UNLV Law

redirect
Last time updated on 13/08/2025

This paper was published in Scholarly Commons @ UNLV Law.

Having an issue?

Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.