Retrofits are a necessity for reducing the UK’s energy demand and carbon emissions.
However, with 26 million homes to treat and massive implications for material
consumption, life cycle energy and carbon impacts demand close attention; this refers to
the operating impacts, as well as the embodied impacts, i.e. those expended in products
for resource extraction, manufacture, and end-of-life waste treatment and disposal. Sparse
data on retrofits and inconsistency in life cycle methods confounds the relationship
between operating and embodied impacts at a population-level, meaning that
identification of the dominant factor, and hence retrofit’s overall benefit, remains
ambiguous. Variability of embodied impact data, and underrepresentation of prominent
retrofit materials were found to present further barriers to robust analysis. A redefined
approach for a “retrofit life cycle analysis” (RLCA) is proposed, alleviating
inconsistencies present in previous studies, and pinpointing the focus on the life cycle
performance of thermal measures. This enables the derivation of an operating savings and
embodied expenditure balance (O:E), which facilitates better evaluation of the life cycle
performance than simply describing the resulting operating or embodied impacts.
Through RLCA and the O:E balance, quantifiable parameters for proceeding,
redesigning, or discontinuing the retrofit may be established, described as the “Retrofit
Tipping Point”. The approach is tested with two archetypal UK case study houses and
proposed retrofits, plus variants. Operating impact savings were found to dominate the
O:E balance in all variants, demonstrating that the retrofits achieved operating savings in
excess of the embodied expenditure, indicative of a favourable energy and carbon life
cycle impact. Insulation materials made the largest embodied contribution in most cases.
Case study data was comparable in magnitude to other literature studies; linear
regressions relating operating and embodied impacts revealed line gradients close to zero,
indicating very minimal change in embodied impacts as operating energies reduce. This
suggests that even extensive retrofits can be beneficial over their life cycle.EPSRC Doctoral Training Partnership fundin
Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.