Chronic inflation has affected Latin America for decades, leading to many stabilization attempts. We develop a novel database with 46 stabilization/disinflation programs across 13 Latin American countries between 1970-2020. We classify them as failures, temporary stabilizations, and lasting stabilizations to study their differences. Our main findings are: 1) programs have failed to stabilize very often; 2) the nominal exchange rate acts as a de facto anchor, decelerating faster than inflation; meaning that the real exchange rate appreciates during stabilization; 3) lasting stabilizations begin with stronger fiscal and balance of payments (BoP) positions; 4) lasting stabilizations are preceded by BoP and fiscal adjustments associated with high GDP contractions; 5) lasting stabilizations keep fiscal accounts balanced for several years after programs are launched; 6) stabilizations typically boost economic growth in the short run; 7) the current account of the BoP worsens during the stabilization process; 8) temporary stabilizations are interrupted by domestic currency depreciations; and 9) many stabilization experiences end up in currency crises despite their success in ending chronic inflation
Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.