This dissertation consists of three essays on corporate finance.
The first essay studies the differential information content on a firm’s fundamentals of top
executives’ insider trades. It is well understood that a CEO and a CFO have played very
different roles in achieving the goal of a firm. A CEO manages a firm largely from a strategic
perspective, while a CFO focuses more on the tactical aspect. However, it is very difficult to
assess their economic contributions separately because we only observe their joint action and
overall firm performance on the firm level. As a novel approach, we analysis their insider
trading activities and the firm’s following fundamentals changes in this study to understand
their different roles in affecting the firm as a nature experiment. Our results suggests that a
CEO have large impact on a firm’s long term persistent performance while a CFO affects the
firm’s short-term cyclical performance. Moreover CEOs also tend to be more conservative in
investment after additional purchase. This finding is consistent with the fact that they have
different responsibilities in managing the firm.
The second essay, included in Chapter 2, also deals with the topic of information content on
executives’ insider trading activities. Instead of concentrating on purchases, we study whether
the executive’s insider sales also reflect firm’s fundenmentals and compare the information
content contained in CEOs’ and CFOs’ trades. This study highlights the nuanced differences
in trading behaviors between CEOs and CFOs and underscores the importance of sales trades
as indicators of future firm events and the firm’s fundamentals. These insights contribute
to the broader understanding of insider trading dynamics and their implications for market
efficiency.
The third essay, included in Chapter 3, is ”The Real Effects of Cybersecurity Breaches on
Firms and Managers’ Attentiveness”. This study explores the adverse impact of information
breaches and the impact of managers’ attentiveness, measured by the time managers need to
identify the breaches. We find that the time lag from when the breach is identified to when
the announcement is made affects the market reaction and the firm’s operating performance.
The time lag has a quadratic relationship with the cumulative abnormal return in the short
term and with earnings in the long term. Also, the firms tend to react quickly to security
breaches (14.5 days early) when they have a technical-related chief officer
Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.