Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy management: a systematic review of the clinical practice guidelines and recommendations.

Abstract

AIMS: In light of recent advances in imaging techniques, molecular understanding and therapeutic options in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), we performed a systematic review of current guidelines for the diagnosis and management of HCM in order to identify consensus and discrepant areas in the clinical practice guidelines. METHODS AND RESULTS: We systematically reviewed the English language guidelines and recommendations for the management of HCM in adults. MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched for guidelines published in the last 10 years. Following a systematic search, three guidelines on the diagnosis and management of HCM were identified, all of which were robustly developed (AGREE rigour of development score ≥50%). These guidelines were authored by the major European (ESC; 2023), American (AHA/ACC/AMSSM/HRS/PACES/SCMR; 2024) and Japanese (JCS/JHFS; 2018) cardiovascular societies. There was broad consensus on echocardiographic recommendations, the medical and invasive management of HCM, the application of genetic testing and family screening, and exercise and reproductive recommendations in HCM. There were areas of variability in the definition and diagnostic criteria for HCM, cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging recommendations and assessment of sudden cardiac death (SCD) risk and prevention strategies. Due to the JCS/JHFS guideline being older, there are no recommendations on the use of cardiac myosin ATPase inhibitors. CONCLUSION: Contemporary guidelines for HCM achieve consensus across a broad range of criteria and recommendations concerning diagnosis and management. However, variations in the approach towards risk assessment for SCD exist between the guidelines. There are also more subtle differences concerning diagnostic criteria and the utility of late gadolinium enhancement for risk stratification, which will likely evolve as the evidence-base broadens

Similar works

This paper was published in Queen Mary Research Online.

Having an issue?

Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.

Licence: This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Lice