Animals as Property, Quasi-Property or Quasi-Person

Abstract

The field of animal law has been structured for the last twenty-five years around two key paradigms: (i) property v. persons and (ii) rights v. welfare. In this talk, Professor Fernández explains why both of these binaries are unhelpful traps for the field and why she thinks we need to move towards a more flexible legal status for nonhuman animals, which she terms quasi-property/quasi-personhood. In the quasi-hood approach to the legal status of nonhuman animals, nonhuman animals are more than mere property but they are also persons of a sort, legal persons, because they have legal rights, and only legal persons have legal rights.UVic Graduate Student Law & Society Research GroupFacultyUnreviewe

Similar works

Full text

thumbnail-image

UVic’s Research and Learning Repository

redirect
Last time updated on 27/12/2024

This paper was published in UVic’s Research and Learning Repository.

Having an issue?

Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.

Licence: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ca/