Aggressivity is a type of widespread behavior in our society,
yet its outcomes are everything but desirable. If evolutionary,
being aggressive might have given some clear advantages to
one to prevail (e.g., seizing resources, better mating options);
nowadays, aggressive behavior held none of those advan-
tages, being a form of prevarication where the ultimate goal
is to harm another individual, either physically, emotionally,
morally or materially. Why, then, is aggressive behavior still
persistent despite the rise of cooperative societies? In this
doctoral Thesis, with the aid of three controlled experiments
and the expertise of Behavioral Economics and Neuroscience,
I aim to shed more light on non-pathological aggressiveness,
its genetic underpinnings, and cognitive mechanisms. Specif-
ically, we found that some genetic variants of dopamine and
serotonin are highly connected with actions and beliefs re-
garding cooperation and punishment, where having a par-
ticular variant makes one more prone to act and think pes-
simistically toward the behaviors of others or to free-ride more.
In another experiment, we demonstrate that extreme exertion
of self-control makes it more probable to behave aggressively
in a subsequent social situation. Frontal areas dedicated to
impulse control regulation are, in fact, extremely vulnerable
to functional fatigue, showing signs of local sleep. In this neu-
ronal phenomenon, groups of neurons fire at frequencies typ-
ical of sleep states instead of the ones of wake. Our exper-
iment associated the prolonged exertion of self-control with
the emergence of delta waves in frontal areas dedicated to
impulse and emotion regulation and subsequent aggressive
choices in a series of proxied social situations
Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.