Connecticut

Abstract

In general, the Connecticut commission is hostile to expansive definitions of mandatory subjects of bargaining, sometimes issuing decisions that are results-driven and an expression of a preference for the substance of the employer’s decision. There are a couple of distinctions between police and other units: The Commission is more likely to weigh safety on the side of bargaining for police than others. The Commission treats the requirement to bargain surveillance-based decision more expansively for non-police units than police-units. The Commission is more likely to find subcontracting of police work to an outside agency to be a mandatory subject of bargaining

Similar works

Full text

thumbnail-image

bepress Legal Repository

redirect
Last time updated on 25/10/2024

This paper was published in bepress Legal Repository.

Having an issue?

Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.